首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States
【24h】

Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States

机译:常规,混合动力,插电式混合动力或电动汽车?美国基于州的比较碳和能源足迹分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Electric vehicles (EVs), plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) are often considered as better options in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption compared to internal combustion vehicles. However, making any decision among these vehicle options is not a straightforward process due to temporal and spatial variations, such as the sources of the electricity used and regional driving patterns. In this study, we compared these vehicle options across 50 states, taking into account state-specific average and marginal electricity generation mixes, regional driving patterns, and vehicle and battery manufacturing impacts. Furthermore, a policy scenario proposing the widespread use of solar energy to charge EVs and PHEVs is evaluated. Based on the average electricity generation mix scenario, EVs are found to be least carbon-intensive vehicle option in 24 states, while HEVs are found to be the most energy-efficient option in 45 states. In the marginal electricity mix scenario, widespread adoption of EVs is found to be an unwise strategy given the existing and near-future marginal electricity generation mix. On the other hand, EVs can be superior to other alternatives in terms of energy-consumption, if the required energy to generate 1 kW h of electricity is below 1.25 kWh. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:与温室气体排放和能源消耗相比,电动汽车(EV),插电式混合动力电动汽车(PHEV)和混合动力电动汽车(HEV)通常被认为是更好的选择。然而,由于时间和空间的变化,例如所使用的电力来源和区域驾驶模式,在这些车辆选择中做出任何决定都不是一个简单的过程。在本研究中,我们在考虑了各州特定的平均和边际发电组合,区域驾驶模式以及车辆和电池制造影响的情况下,比较了50个州的这些车辆选择。此外,评估了一种政策方案,该方案提出了广泛使用太阳能为电动汽车和插电式混合电动汽车充电的政策。根据平均发电量情景,在24个州发现电动汽车是碳排放量最少的车辆选择,而在45个州发现混合动力汽车是最节能的选择。在边际电力混合情景中,鉴于现有和近乎未来的边际电力混合,发现电动汽车的广泛采用是不明智的策略。另一方面,如果产生1 kWh的电力所需的能量低于1.25 kWh,则EV可以在能耗方面优于其他替代方案。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号