首页> 外文期刊>Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry >Determination of ochratoxin A in grains by immuno-ultrafiltration and HPLC-fluorescence detection after postcolumn derivatisation in an electrochemical cell
【24h】

Determination of ochratoxin A in grains by immuno-ultrafiltration and HPLC-fluorescence detection after postcolumn derivatisation in an electrochemical cell

机译:柱中衍生化后通过免疫超滤和HPLC荧光检测法测定谷物中的ra曲霉毒素A

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper presents a new sample clean-up method based on immuno-ultrafiltration for the analysis of ochratoxin A in cereals. In contrast to immunoaffinity chromatography, in immuno-ultrafiltration, the antibodies are used in non-immobilised form. Ochratoxin A was extracted with ACN/water (60/40, v/v), and the extract was loaded onto the ultrafiltration device. After a washing step with phosphate-buffered saline, containing 0.05% Tween 20, ochratoxin A was eluted with MeOH/acetic acid (99/1, v/v). The detection of ochratoxin A was carried out with high-performance liquid chromatography and a fluorescence detector coupled to an electrochemical cell (Coring cell). The electrochemical cell was used to eliminate matrix interferences by oxidising matrix compounds. The method was validated by repeatedly analysing spiked barley and rye samples as well as a certified wheat reference material. Recoveries and standard deviations (1 SD) were found to be 71 ± 9%, 77 ± 12% and 77 ± 8% in wheat, barley and rye, respectively. The limit of detection (S/N = 3) and limit of quantitation (S/N = 10) were determined to be 0.4 μg kg-1 and 1 μg kg-1. The analysis of the certified reference material resulted in ochratoxin A concentrations which were in the range assigned by the producer. Additionally, the effect of the electrochemical cell on other widely used clean-up techniques, namely the immunoaffinity clean-up and multifunctional columns (Mycosep #229), was evaluated. In all clean-up methods, an improvement of the chromatogram quality was registered.
机译:本文提出了一种基于免疫超滤的新样品净化方法,用于分析谷物中的曲霉毒素A。与免疫亲和层析相反,在免疫超滤中,抗体以非固定形式使用。用ACN /水(60/40,v / v)提取曲霉毒素A,并将提取物上样至超滤装置。用含0.05%Tween 20的磷酸盐缓冲盐水洗涤后,用甲醇/乙酸(99/1,v / v)洗脱曲霉毒素A。 high曲霉毒素A的检测是通过高效液相色谱法和与电化学池(Coring cell)耦合的荧光检测器进行的。电化学电池用于通过氧化基质化合物消除基质干扰。该方法通过重复分析加标的大麦和黑麦样品以及经认证的小麦参考物质而得到验证。小麦,大麦和黑麦的回收率和标准偏差(1 SD)分别为71±9%,77±12%和77±8%。检出限(S / N = 3)和定量限(S / N = 10)被确定为0.4μgkg -1 和1μgkg -1 。经认证的参考物质的分析结果得出曲霉毒素A的浓度在生产商指定的范围内。此外,评估了电化学电池对其他广泛使用的净化技术(即免疫亲和净化和多功能色谱柱(Mycosep#229))的影响。在所有净化方法中,色谱质量都有所提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号