...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Infection Control >Surgical site infections in patients undergoing major operations in a university hospital: Using standardized infection ratio as a benchmarking tool.
【24h】

Surgical site infections in patients undergoing major operations in a university hospital: Using standardized infection ratio as a benchmarking tool.

机译:在大学医院进行主要手术的患者的手术部位感染:使用标准化感染率作为基准工具。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Because patterns of infection acquired in patients undergoing operation are ever changing, it is an essential part of nosocomial infection surveillance programs to periodically document the epidemiologic features of infection in these patients. This study was conducted with the primary intention of describing the incidence and risk factors of the surgical site infection (SSI). METHODS: We performed a prospective study in patients undergoing certain major operations at a 750-bed university hospital in Thailand. The National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) system method and criteria were used for identifying and diagnosing infection. The infection rates were benchmarked with the NNIS report by means of indirect standardization and reported in terms of standardized infection ratio. Risk factors for SSI were evaluated using the multiple logistic regression model. RESULTS: From September 1998 to March 2000, the study included 4193 patients with 4437 major operations. The study identified 192 SSIs, 76 urinary catheter-related urinary tract infections, 26 central line-related bloodstream infections, and 39 instances of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), yielding an infection rate of 4.3 SSIs/100 operations, 11.0 catheter-related urinary tract infections/1000 urinary catheter-days, 6.1 central line-related bloodstream infections/1000 central line-days, and 11.0 VAPs/1000 ventilator-days. When compared with data from NNIS, the standardized infection ratio of SSI, catheter-related urinary tract infection, central line-related bloodstream infection, and VAP were 2.3, 2.1, 1.1, and 0.8, respectively. The factors that significantly associated with SSI were duration of operation in minutes, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and degree of wound contamination. CONCLUSION: All of the infection rates identified, except VAP, were higher than the average NNIS rates. The risk factors for SSI were prolonged duration of operation, poor physical status according to ASA classification, and higher degree of wound contamination.
机译:背景:由于手术患者获得的感染方式不断变化,因此定期记录这些患者的流行病学特征是医院感染监测计划的重要组成部分。进行这项研究的主要目的是描述手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率和危险因素。方法:我们对泰国一家拥有750张床位的大学医院进行某些重大手术的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。国家医院感染监测(NNIS)系统方法和标准用于识别和诊断感染。 NNIS报告通过间接标准化将感染率作为基准,并以标准化感染率进行报告。使用多元逻辑回归模型评估SSI的危险因素。结果:从1998年9月到2000年3月,该研究包括4193例患者和4437例主要手术。该研究确定了192个SSI,76个与导尿管相关的尿路感染,26个与中心线相关的血流感染以及39个呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP),其感染率为4.3个SSIs / 100次手术,11.0个与导管相关尿路感染/ 1000导尿管日,6.1中心线相关的血流感染/ 1000中心线日和11.0 VAP / 1000呼吸机日。与来自NNIS的数据相比,SSI,导管相关性尿路感染,中心线相关性血液感染和VAP的标准化感染率分别为2.3、2.1、1.1和0.8。与SSI显着相关的因素是手术时间(以分钟为单位),美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)等级以及伤口污染的程度。结论:除VAP外,所有确定的感染率均高于平均NNIS感染率。 SSI的危险因素是手术时间延长,根据ASA分类的身体状况不佳以及伤口污染程度较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号