...
首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture and Human Values >The private governance of food: equitable exchange or bizarre bazaar?
【24h】

The private governance of food: equitable exchange or bizarre bazaar?

机译:食品的私人治理:公平交易还是离奇的集市?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In recent years, we have witnessed three parallel and intertwined trends: First, food retail and processing firms have embraced private standards, usually with some form of third party certification employed to verify adherence to those standards. Second, firms have increasingly aligned themselves with, as opposed to fighting off, environmental, fair trade, and other NGOs. Third, firms have embraced supply chain management as a strategy for increasing profits and market share. Together, these trends are part and parcel of the neoliberal blurring of the older liberal distinction between state and civil society. In this paper I ask what the implications of these changes are from the vantage point of the three major approaches to ethics: consequentialism, virtue theory, and rights theory. What are the consequences of these changes for food safety, for suppliers, for consumers? What virtues (e.g., trust, fairness) are these changes likely to embrace and what vices may accompany them? Whose rights will be furthered or curtailed by these changes?
机译:近年来,我们看到了三个平行且相互交织的趋势:首先,食品零售和加工公司已接受私有标准,通常采用某种形式的第三方认证来验证对这些标准的遵守情况。第二,与对抗,对抗环境,公平贸易和其他非政府组织相比,企业越来越趋向于自己。第三,公司已将供应链管理作为增加利润和增加市场份额的战略。总之,这些趋势是国家和公民社会之间较旧的自由主义区别的新自由主义模糊的一部分。在本文中,我要问这些改变的意义是从三种主要的伦理学方法的角度出发的:结果主义,美德理论和权利理论。这些变化对食品安全,供应商和消费者有何后果?这些变化可能包含哪些优点(例如信任,公平),以及伴随这些缺点的恶习?这些更改将促进或减少谁的权利?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号