首页> 外文OA文献 >The private governance of food: equitable exchange or bizarre bazaar?
【2h】

The private governance of food: equitable exchange or bizarre bazaar?

机译:食品的私人治理:公平交易还是离奇的集市?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

"In recent years, we have witnessed three parallel and intertwined trends: First, food retailand processing firms have embraced private standards, usually with some form of thirdparty certification employed to verify adherence to those standards. Second, firms havealigned themselves increasingly aligned themselves with, as opposed to fighting off,environmental, fair trade, and other NGOs. Third, firms have embraced supply chainmanagement as a strategy for increasing profits and market share. Together, these trendsare part and parcel of the neoliberal blurring of the older liberal distinction between stateand civil society. In this paper I ask what the implications of these changes are from thevantage point of the three major approaches to ethics: consequentalism, virtue theory, andrights theory. What are the consequences of these changes for food safety, for suppliers,for consumers? What virtues (e.g., trust, fairness) are these changes likely to embraceand what vices may accompany them? Whose rights will be furthered or curtailed bythese changes?" (author's abstract)
机译:“近年来,我们看到了三个平行且相互交织的趋势:首先,食品零售和加工公司采用了私有标准,通常采用某种形式的第三方认证来验证对这些标准的遵守情况。其次,公司已经与自身保持一致,第三,公司将供应链管理作为提高利润和市场份额的战略,这些趋势共同构成了新自由主义模糊国家与国家之间较早的自由主义区分的重要部分。公民社会,在本文中,我要问这些改变的含义是从三种主要的伦理学方法的优点出发:结果主义,美德理论和权利理论这些变化对食品安全,供应商,消费者的后果是什么?这些变化可能包含哪些美德(例如信任,公平),以及哪些弊端可能伴随这些变化?米?这些更改将促进或减少谁的权利?”(作者摘要)

著录项

  • 作者

    Busch Lawrence;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号