...
【24h】

Q&A

机译:问答环节

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Q: Paul Stoddart asked in the Summer issue about the design of the Spitfire wing and why the designers did not go for a stub centre section which would ease moving the wingless aircraft? A: Simon Snape says that functional, aerodynamic and structural considerations were paramount in the design, and it is unlikely that ease of production and facility to wheel the fuselage around were significant design criteria. It was difficult to fabricate and this delayed completion of the initial production batch while solutions were devised to resolve it. There are many contemporary accounts of fuselages backing up for want of finished wing sets.
机译:问:保罗·斯托达特(Paul Stoddart)在夏季问题上询问了“喷火”机翼的设计,为什么设计者没有选择能够简化无翼飞机移动的短截线中央部分?答:西蒙·斯内普(Simon Snape)说,功能,空气动力学和结构方面的考虑在设计中至为重要,并且易于生产和便于运输的机身不太可能成为重要的设计标准。很难制造,这延迟了最初生产批次的完成,而设计了解决方案来解决它。有很多关于机身后备的现代说法,这些都是由于缺少机翼而造成的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Aeroplane 》 |2014年第8期| 86-88| 共3页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号