首页> 外文期刊>The Academy of Management Review >BREAKING THE SILENCE ABOUT EXITING FIELDWORK: A RELATIONAL APPROACH AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORIZING
【24h】

BREAKING THE SILENCE ABOUT EXITING FIELDWORK: A RELATIONAL APPROACH AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORIZING

机译:打破关于现场作业的沉默:一种相关方法及其对理论化的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is surprising that, to date, a discussion of exiting fieldwork is absent from the management and organization literature-an absence we believe is unjustified. We argue that analyzing exit from fieldwork is important for theorizing. We combine two streams of research-ethnography in the broader social sciences and business marketing on dissolving relationships-to propose a relational framework for conceptualizing and analyzing exit. The framework represents a first attempt to examine exiting in a systematic and nuanced manner, with the objective of understanding why and how breaking the silence about exiting fieldwork may advance theorizing. We develop a typology of four exit types leading to four different approaches to theorizing. We suggest that exit may bring about a new beginning in theorizing rather than closure and that it is not only high-quality relationships in the field but also those that are disruptive that may lead to interesting theorizing.
机译:令人惊讶的是,到目前为止,有关管理和组织文献的讨论都没有进行实地考察,而我们认为这种缺乏是没有道理的。我们认为分析实地考察的退出对于理论化很重要。我们结合了广泛的社会科学和商业营销领域的研究人种学流,以解决关系问题,从而提出了一个用于概念化和分析退出的关系框架。该框架代表了以系统和细致入微的方式检查出口问题的首次尝试,目的是理解为何以及如何打破有关退出实地调查的沉默可以促进理论化的趋势。我们开发了四种出口类型的类型学,导致了四种不同的理论方法。我们建议退出可能会为理论化而不是封闭带来新的起点,不仅是该领域的高质量关系,而且那些具有破坏性的关系都可能导致有趣的理论化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号