首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >An interlaboratory comparison of 16S rRNA gene-based terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and sequencing methods for assessing microbial diversity of seafloor basalts
【2h】

An interlaboratory comparison of 16S rRNA gene-based terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and sequencing methods for assessing microbial diversity of seafloor basalts

机译:基于16S rRNA基因的末端限制性片段长度多态性的实验室间比较和评估海底玄武岩微生物多样性的测序方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We present an interlaboratory comparison between full-length 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) for microbial communities hosted on seafloor basaltic lavas, with the goal of evaluating how similarly these two different DNA-based methods used in two independent labs would estimate the microbial diversity of the same basalt samples. Two samples were selected for these analyses based on differences detected in the overall levels of microbial diversity between them. Richness estimators indicate that TRFLP analysis significantly underestimates the richness of the relatively high-diversity seafloor basalt microbial community: at least 50% of species from the high-diversity site are missed by TRFLP. However, both methods reveal similar dominant species from the samples, and they predict similar levels of relative diversity between the two samples. Importantly, these results suggest that DNA-extraction or PCR-related bias between the two laboratories is minimal. We conclude that TRFLP may be useful for relative comparisons of diversity between basalt samples, for identifying dominant species, and for estimating the richness and evenness of low-diversity, skewed populations of seafloor basalt microbial communities, but that TRFLP may miss a majority of species in relatively highly diverse samples.
机译:我们提供了一个实验室间的全长16S rRNA基因序列分析与末端限制性片段长度多态性(TRFLP)之间的实验室间比较,该微生物群落位于海底玄武岩熔岩上,目的是评估这两种不同的基于DNA的方法在两种独立方法中的相似性实验室将估计相同玄武岩样品的微生物多样性。基于检测到的两个样品之间总体微生物多样性水平的差异,选择了两个样品进行这些分析。丰富度估计值表明,TRFLP分析大大低估了相对高度多样性的海底玄武岩微生物群落的丰富度:TRFLP错过了来自高多样性地点的至少50%的物种。但是,这两种方法都从样本中揭示了相似的优势种,并且它们预测了两个样本之间的相对多样性相似。重要的是,这些结果表明,两个实验室之间的DNA提取或PCR相关偏倚是最小的。我们得出结论,TRFLP可能用于相对比较玄武岩样品之间的多样性,识别优势物种以及估计低多样性,偏斜的海底玄武岩微生物群落的丰富度和均匀性,但是TRFLP可能会遗漏大多数物种在相对高度多样化的样本中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号