首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Taylor Francis Open Select >How Task Features Impact Evidence From Assessments Embedded in Simulations and Games
【2h】

How Task Features Impact Evidence From Assessments Embedded in Simulations and Games

机译:任务功能如何影响来自模拟和游戏中嵌入的评估的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

One of the key ideas of evidence-centered assessment design (ECD) is that task features can be deliberately manipulated to change the psychometric properties of items. ECD identifies a number of roles that task-feature variables can play, including determining the focus of evidence, guiding form creation, determining item difficulty and discrimination, characterizing proficiency, and producing task variants. Assessment developers can use these task features to manipulate the psychometric properties of both conventional assessment formats and complex tasks embedded in simulations and games.Simulations and games tasks present additional challenges: even defining what corresponds to an item can be difficult. Often task features are determined by game or simulation logic rather than psychometric design. Despite these difficulties, the roles for task features identified in ECD are useful for analyzing the psychometric properties of embedded assessments in simulations and games. This article compares a conventional test of mathematics-problem-solving ability using word problems to an assessment of conceptual physics, creativity, and conscientiousness embedded in the game Newton’s Playground, describing how the task roles play out in each setting and how they can be used to manipulate the evidence provided by an assessment.
机译:以证据为中心的评估设计(ECD)的关键思想之一是,可以故意操纵任务特征以更改项目的心理计量属性。 ECD可以确定任务功能变量可以发挥的许多作用,包括确定证据的重点,指导表格创建,确定项目的难度和歧视性,表征熟练程度以及产生任务变体。评估开发人员可以使用这些任务功能来操纵传统评估格式以及嵌入在模拟和游戏中的复杂任务的心理测量特性。模拟和游戏任务带来了其他挑战:即使定义与项目对应的内容也很困难。通常,任务功能是由游戏或仿真逻辑而非心理测验设计确定的。尽管存在这些困难,但在ECD中确定的任务功能的角色对于分析模拟和游戏中嵌入式评估的心理测量特性很有用。本文将使用单词问题进行的数学问题解决能力的常规测试与评估牛顿游乐场中嵌入的概念物理学,创造力和尽责性进行了比较,描述了任务角色在每种情况下如何发挥作用以及如何使用操纵评估提供的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号