首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >A Multitrait–Multimethod Analysis of the Construct Validity of Child Anxiety Disorders in a Clinical Sample
【2h】

A Multitrait–Multimethod Analysis of the Construct Validity of Child Anxiety Disorders in a Clinical Sample

机译:临床样本中儿童焦虑障碍构建有效性的多特征多方法分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present study examines the construct validity of separation anxiety disorder (SAD), social phobia (SoP), panic disorder (PD), and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in a clinical sample of children. Participants were 174 children, 6 to 17 years old (94 boys) who had undergone a diagnostic evaluation at a university hospital based clinic. Parent and child ratings of symptom severity were assessed using the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC). Diagnostician ratings were obtained from the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children and Parents (ADIS: C/P). Discriminant and convergent validity were assessed using confirmatory factor analytic techniques to test a multitrait–multimethod model. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the current classification of these child anxiety disorders. The disorders demonstrated statistical independence from each other (discriminant validity of traits), the model fit better when the anxiety syndromes were specified than when no specific syndromes were specified (convergent validity), and the methods of assessment yielded distinguishable, unique types of information about child anxiety (discriminant validity of methods). Using a multi-informant approach, these findings support the distinctions between childhood anxiety disorders as delineated in the current classification system, suggesting that disagreement between informants in psychometric studies of child anxiety measures is not due to poor construct validity of these anxiety syndromes.
机译:本研究在儿童临床样本中检查了分离性焦虑症(SAD),社交恐惧症(SoP),恐慌症(PD)和广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的结构效度。参加者为174名6至17岁的儿童(94名男孩),他们在一家大学医院的诊所进行了诊断评估。使用儿童多维焦虑量表(MASC)评估父母和孩子的症状严重程度。从儿童和父母的焦虑症访谈时间表(ADIS:C / P)中获得诊断医师的评分。使用确认性因子分析技术评估判别和收敛效度,以测试多特征多方法模型。验证性因素分析支持了这些儿童焦虑症的当前分类。这些疾病表现出相互之间的统计独立性(性状的判别有效性),当指定了焦虑症候群时,该模型比没有指定特定症状时更适合(收敛效度),并且评估方法产生了与众不同的,独特的信息。儿童焦虑症(方法的判别有效性)。使用多信息方法,这些发现支持了当前分类系统中所描述的儿童焦虑症之间的区别,这表明在儿童焦虑测度的心理学计量研究中,线人之间的分歧并不是由于这些焦虑症候群的构造效度差所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号