首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Dynamic cerebral autoregulation: different signal processing methods without influence on results and reproducibility
【2h】

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation: different signal processing methods without influence on results and reproducibility

机译:动态脑自动调节:不同的信号处理方法不会影响结果和可重复性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cerebral autoregulation controls cerebral blood flow under changing cerebral perfusion pressure. Standards for measurement and analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) are lacking. In this study, dCA reproducibility, quantified by intraclass correlation coefficient, is evaluated for different methodological approaches of transfer function analysis (TFA) and compared with multimodal pressure flow analysis (MMPF). dCA parameters were determined in 19 healthy volunteers during three 15-min lasting epochs of spontaneous breathing. Every spontaneous breathing epoch was followed by 5 min of paced breathing at 6 cycles/min. These six measurements were performed in both a morning and an afternoon session. Analysis compared raw data pre-processing by mean subtraction versus smoothness priors detrending. The estimation of spectral density was either performed by averaging of subsequent time windows or by smoothing the spectrum of the whole recording. No significant influence of pre-processing and spectral estimation on dCA parameters was found. Therefore, there seems to be no need to prescribe a specific signal-processing regime. Poor reproducibility of gain and phase was found for TFA as well as for MMPF. Based on reproducibility, no preference can be made for morning versus afternoon measurements, neither for spontaneous versus paced breathing. Finally, reproducibility results are not in favour of TFA or MMPF.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11517-010-0706-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:脑自动调节可在不断变化的脑灌注压力下控制脑血流量。缺乏用于动态脑自动调节(dCA)的测量和分析标准。在这项研究中,通过类内相关系数量化的dCA重现性,针对传递函数分析(TFA)的不同方法学方法进行了评估,并与多峰压力流量分析(MMPF)进行了比较。在三个持续15分钟的自发呼吸周期中,在19位健康志愿者中确定了dCA参数。每个自发呼吸时期后,以6个周期/分钟的速度进行5分钟的节奏呼吸。这六个测量是在上午和下午进行的。分析通过平均减法与平滑度在去趋势化之前比较了原始数据预处理。通过平均随后的时间窗口或通过平滑整个记录的频谱来执行频谱密度的估计。没有发现预处理和光谱估计对dCA参数有重大影响。因此,似乎没有必要规定特定的信号处理方案。发现TFA和MMPF的增益和相位再现性差。基于可重复性,无法优先选择早晨和下午的测量值,无论是自然呼吸还是定速呼吸。最后,重现性结果不利于TFA或MMPF。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s11517-010-0706-y)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号