首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >The modified lateral supraorbital approach for tumors of the petroclival junction extending into the anterior cerebellopontine area
【2h】

The modified lateral supraorbital approach for tumors of the petroclival junction extending into the anterior cerebellopontine area

机译:改良的眶上外侧入路扩展至小前桥脑桥区

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Various surgical approaches for the removal of meningioma and trigeminal schwannoma in the petroclival junction (PCJ) and anterior cerebellopontine area (CPA) have been described previously. In this study, we compared the surgical outcomes of the combined petrosal approach and a modified lateral supraorbital (MLSO) approach and evaluated the reliability and safety of the MLSO approach. Fifty patients underwent surgical treatment using the combined petrosal or MLSO approach between 1996 and 2011. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and compared the two approaches. Among 50 patients, 27 patients underwent operation through the combined petrosal approach and 23 underwent operation through the MLSO approach. The operation time of the MLSO approach was significantly shorter than that of the combined petrosal approach (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in the gross total resection rate between the two approaches (p = 0.67). After the operation, the improvement in Karnofsky performance score and Mean Glasgow outcomes scales were better in the MLSO approach, but without statistical significance (p = 0.723, p = 0.20 respectively). Complications occurred more often with the combined petrosal approach than with MLSO. Facial nerve palsy was the most common complication, followed by hearing difficulty. The frequency of these two complications was higher in the combined petrosal approach. Various tumors occurring in the PCJ and anterior CPA remain a challenging problem for neurosurgeons. The new modified approach of MLSO yielded good surgical results for these tumors compared to the combined petrosal approach. Therefore, the MLSO approach might be a good option for removal of tumors in the PCJ including anterior CPA.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11060-016-2061-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:先前已经描述了各种手术方法,以去除石棺连接处(PCJ)和小脑桥前区(CPA)中的脑膜瘤和三叉神经鞘瘤。在这项研究中,我们比较了联合岩体入路和改良的眶上眶上(MLSO)入路的手术效果,并评估了MLSO入路的可靠性和安全性。在1996年至2011年之间,有50例患者采用了联合或联合MLSO方法进行了手术治疗。我们回顾性分析了临床数据并比较了这两种方法。在50例患者中,有27例通过联合椎体入路手术,23例通过MLSO入路手术。 MLSO入路的手术时间明显短于联合岩土入路的手术时间(p = 0.03)。两种方法的总切除率无显着差异(p = 0.67)。手术后,在MLSO方法中Karnofsky成绩得分和平均格拉斯哥结局量表的改善更好,但无统计学意义(分别为p = 0.723,p = 0.20)。与MLSO相比,合并岩性方法更易发生并发症。面神经麻痹是最常见的并发症,其次是听力困难。在组合的岩性方法中,这两种并发症的发生率更高。对于神经外科医生来说,发生在PCJ和前CPA中的各种肿瘤仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题。 MLSO的新改良方法与联合岩土疗法相比,对这些肿瘤具有良好的手术效果。因此,MLSO方法可能是去除PCJ中包括前CPA的肿瘤的好选择。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s11060-016-2061-9)包含补充材料,可用于授权用户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号