首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Implementation Science and Employer Disability Practices: Embedding Implementation Factors in Research Designs
【2h】

Implementation Science and Employer Disability Practices: Embedding Implementation Factors in Research Designs

机译:实施科学与雇主残疾实践:在研究设计中嵌入实施因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose For work disability research to have an impact on employer policies and practices it is important for such research to acknowledge and incorporate relevant aspects of the workplace. The goal of this article is to summarize recent theoretical and methodological advances in the field of Implementation Science, relate these to research of employer disability management practices, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration culminating in an invited 3-day conference, “Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability”, held October 14–16, 2015, in Hopkinton, MA, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with a special panel of knowledge experts with direct employer experience. Results A 4-phase implementation model including both outer and inner contexts was adopted as the most appropriate conceptual framework, and aligned well with the set of process evaluation factors described in both the work disability prevention literature and the grey literature. Innovative interventions involving disability risk screening and psychologically-based interventions have been slow to gain traction among employers and insurers. Research recommendations to address this are : (1) to assess organizational culture and readiness for change in addition to individual factors; (2) to conduct process evaluations alongside controlled trials; (3) to analyze decision-making factors among stakeholders; and (4 ) to solicit input from employers and insurers during early phases of study design. Conclusions Future research interventions involving workplace support and involvement to prevent disability may be more feasible for implementation if organizational decision-making factors are imbedded in research designs and interventions are developed to take account of these influences.
机译:目的为了使工作障碍研究对雇主的政策和做法产生影响,重要的是,此类研究应承认并纳入工作场所的相关方面。本文的目的是总结实施科学领域的最新理论和方法论进展,将其与雇主残疾管理实践的研究联系起来,并提出未来的研究重点。方法作者参加了为期一年的合作,最终在2015年10月14日至16日在美国马萨诸塞州霍普金顿市举行的为期3天的邀请会议中,名为“改进预防雇主行为的研究”。此次合作包括对文献的主题回顾,确定关键领域和挑战的小组电话会议,起草原始文件,对行业出版物进行回顾,以及会议演讲,其中包括来自同行研究人员的反馈以及专门小组讨论的问答环节。具有直接雇主经验的知识专家。结果采用包括外部和内部上下文的4阶段实施模型作为最合适的概念框架,并与预防工作障碍文献和灰色文献中描述的过程评估因素集保持一致。涉及残疾风险筛查的创新干预措施和基于心理的干预措施在吸引雇主和保险公司方面一直很缓慢。针对此问题的研究建议是:(1)评估组织文化和除个别因素外的变革准备; (2)与对照试验一起进行过程评估; (3)分析利益相关者之间的决策因素; (4)在研究设计的早期阶段,征求雇主和保险公司的意见。结论如果将组织决策因素纳入研究设计中并考虑到这些影响而制定干预措施,则涉及工作场所支持和参与以防止残疾的未来研究干预措施可能更可行。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号