首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Comparison of non-invasive peripheral venous saturations with venous blood co-oximetry
【2h】

Comparison of non-invasive peripheral venous saturations with venous blood co-oximetry

机译:无创性外周静脉血饱和度与静脉血氧饱和度测定法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The estimation of venous oxygen saturations using photoplethysmography (PPG) may be useful as a noninvasive continuous method of detecting changes in regional oxygen supply and demand (e.g. in the splanchnic circulation). The aim of this research was to compare PPG-derived peripheral venous oxygen saturations directly with venous saturation measured from co-oximetry blood samples, to assess the feasibility of non-invasive local venous oxygen saturation. This paper comprises two similar studies: one in healthy spontaneously-breathing volunteers and one in mechanically ventilated anaesthetised patients. In both studies, PPG-derived estimates of peripheral venous oxygen saturations (SxvO2) were compared with co-oximetry samples (ScovO2) of venous blood from the dorsum of the hand. The results were analysed and correlation between the PPG-derived results and co-oximetry was tested for. In the volunteer subjects,moderate correlation (r = 0.81) was seen between SxvO2 values and co-oximetry derived venous saturations (ScovO2), with a mean (±SD) difference of +5.65 ± 14.3% observed between the two methods. In the anaesthetised patients SxvO2 values were only 3.81% lower than SpO2 and tended to underestimate venous saturation (mean difference = –2.67 ± 5.89%) while correlating weakly with ScovO2 (r = 0.10). The results suggest that significant refinement of the technique is needed to sufficiently improve accuracy to produce clinically meaningful measurement of peripheral venous oxygen saturation. In anaesthetised patients the use of the technique may be severely limited by cutaneous arteriovenous shunting.
机译:使用光电容积描记术(PPG)估算静脉血氧饱和度可能是一种无创的连续方法,可用于检测区域氧气供需(例如内脏循环)的变化。这项研究的目的是直接比较PPG衍生的外周静脉血氧饱和度与从血氧仪血样中测得的静脉血饱和度,以评估非侵入性局部静脉血氧饱和度的可行性。本文包括两项类似的研究:一项针对健康自发呼吸的志愿者,另一项针对机械通气的麻醉患者。在两项研究中,均将PPG得出的外周静脉血氧饱和度(SxvO2)与手背静脉血的共血氧饱和度测定样品(ScovO2)进行了比较。分析结果,并测试了PPG衍生结果与血氧定量法之间的相关性。在志愿者受试者中,SxvO2值与血氧饱和度测定法得出的静脉饱和度(ScovO2)之间存在中等相关性(r = 0.81),两种方法之间的平均值(±SD)差异为+5.65±14.3%。在麻醉的患者中,SxvO2值仅比SpO2低3.81%,并倾向于低估静脉饱和度(平均差异= –2.67±5.89%),而与ScovO2的相关性较弱(r = 0.10)。结果表明,需要对该技术进行重大改进,以充分提高准确性,以产生临床上有意义的外周静脉血氧饱和度测量值。在麻醉患者中,该技术的使用可能会受到皮肤动静脉分流的严重限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号