首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Labour force activity after 65: what explain recent trends in Denmark Germany and Sweden?
【2h】

Labour force activity after 65: what explain recent trends in Denmark Germany and Sweden?

机译:65岁以后的劳动力活动:如何解释丹麦德国和瑞典的最新趋势?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In most OECD member countries labour force attachment, has increased in recent years not only in the age groups 60–64 years but also among people 65 years and older. Focus in this paper is on the trend in older workers’ labour force participation in Denmark, Germany and Sweden since 2004. Main emphasis is given to people aged 65–69 years eligible for social security retirement programs from age 65. The gender aspect is included to accommodate different trends for women and men. To explain country differences in trends, the importance of changes in retirement policies of relevance for this age group and cohort relevant changes in education and health is examined and discussed. Further, country differences in the impact from education and health is examined. Results show that the largest increase in labour force participation among people aged 65–69 years has taken place in Sweden following by Germany, while the increase in Denmark is rather small. While the increase in Germany mainly seems to be a result of policy reforms, the increase in Sweden appear to be a result of a combination of policy changes and an increasing educational level. Financial incentives seem most important in Germany and only of minor importance in Denmark, where policy changes directed towards individuals above the age of 65 appear to have been too small so far to affect retirement behaviour significantly.
机译:在大多数经合组织成员国中,近年来,不仅在60-64岁年龄段,而且在65岁及65岁以上的人群中,劳动力的依存度都有所增加。本文的重点是自2004年以来丹麦,德国和瑞典的老年工人参与劳动的趋势。主要重点是65-69岁有资格从65岁起参加社会保障退休计划的人。其中包括性别方面适应男女的不同趋势。为了解释国家趋势的差异,研究并讨论了与该年龄段相关的退休政策的变化以及同类人群在教育和健康方面的变化的重要性。此外,研究了受教育和卫生影响的国家差异。结果表明,在瑞典65-69岁的人群中,劳动力参与的增加最大,其次是德国,而丹麦的增加幅度很小。虽然德国的增加似乎主要是政策改革的结果,但瑞典的增加似乎是政策变化和教育水平提高相结合的结果。财政激励措施在德国似乎最重要,而在丹麦则次要。在丹麦,针对65岁以上的人的政策变化似乎太小,以至于无法显着影响退休行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号