首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Modus vivendi Toleration and Power Modus vivendi Toleration and Power
【2h】

Modus vivendi Toleration and Power Modus vivendi Toleration and Power

机译:Vivendi耐受性和力量Modus vivendi耐受性和力量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article deals with modus vivendi, toleration and power. On the face of it toleration and modus vivendi are in tension with each other, because of the power condition on toleration: that an agent is tolerant only if they have the power to engage in an alternative, non- or intolerant form of behaviour, and this seems to be absent in modus vivendi. The article argues that the scope of the power condition is unclear, but might be thought much more extensive than usually supposed. This becomes clear when the agent’s thoughts are subjected to a counterfactual test, concerning what would occur in their ideal world. However it is in the nature of ideals that they cannot usually be subject to a counterfactual variation here, since they determine the ideal world’s content. The article concludes that only a commitment to the other party’s freedom for its own sake proves robust in the face of counterfactual idealisation, but that it is questionable whether the dispositions that characterise toleration should be subject to so demanding a test.
机译:本文讨论了生活方式,宽容和权力。从表面上看,宽容和惯常方式彼此之间处于紧张状态,这是因为宽容的权力条件:只有当代理人有权参与另一种,非宽容或不宽容的行为形式时,他们才是宽容的,并且这种方式似乎在维旺迪方法中不存在。文章认为,权力条件的范围尚不清楚,但可能会比通常认为的要广泛得多。当行动者的思想受到关于他们理想世界中会发生的事情的反事实考验时,这一点就变得很清楚。但是,理想的本质是,它们通常不能在这里受到反事实的改变,因为它们决定了理想世界的内容。文章得出的结论是,面对反事实的理想化,只有为自己的利益而对另一方的自由作出的承诺才是有力的,但是以容忍为特征的性格是否应该接受如此严格的考验值得怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号