首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >The role of contour polarity objectness and regularities in haptic and visual perception
【2h】

The role of contour polarity objectness and regularities in haptic and visual perception

机译:轮廓极性客观性和规律性在触觉和视觉感知中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Regularities like symmetry (mirror reflection) and repetition (translation) play an important role in both visual and haptic (active touch) shape perception. Altering figure-ground factors to change what is perceived as an object influences regularity detection. For vision, symmetry is usually easier to detect within one object, whereas repetition is easier to detect across two objects. For haptics, we have not found this interaction between regularity type and objectness (Cecchetto & Lawson, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 103–125, ; Lawson, Ajvani, & Cecchetto, Experimental Psychology, 63, 197–214, ). However, our studies used repetition stimuli with mismatched concavities, convexities, and luminance, and so had mismatched contour polarities. Such stimuli may be processed differently to stimuli with matching contour polarities. We investigated this possibility. For haptics, speeded symmetry and repetition detection for novel, planar shapes was similar. Performance deteriorated strikingly if contour polarity mismatched (keeping objectness constant), whilst there was a modest disadvantage for between-2objects:facing-sides compared to within-1object:outer-sides comparisons (keeping contour polarity constant). For the same task for vision, symmetry detection was similar to haptics (strong costs for mismatched contour polarity, weaker costs for between-2objects:facing-sides comparisons), but repetition detection was very different (weak costs for mismatched contour polarity, strong benefits for between-2objects:facing-sides comparisons). Thus, objectness was less influential than contour polarity for both haptic and visual symmetry detection, and for haptic repetition detection. However, for visual repetition detection, objectness effects reversed direction (within-1object:outer-sides comparisons were harder) and were stronger than contour polarity effects. This pattern of results suggests that regularity detection reflects information extraction as well as regularity distributions in the physical world.
机译:诸如对称(镜面反射)和重复(平移)之类的规则在视觉和触觉(主动触摸)形状感知中都起着重要作用。更改图形背景因素以更改被视为对象的对象会影响规律性检测。对于视觉而言,对称通常通常更容易在一个对象内检测到,而重复在两个对象之间更容易检测到。对于触觉,我们尚未发现规律性类型与客观性之间的这种相互作用(Cecchetto和Lawson,《实验心理学杂志:人类的感知与表现》,第43页,第103-125页; Lawson,Ajvani和&Cecchetto,《实验心理学》,第63卷,第197页, 214,)。但是,我们的研究使用的凹痕,凸度和亮度不匹配的重复刺激,轮廓极性不匹配。这样的刺激可以被不同地处理成具有匹配轮廓极性的刺激。我们调查了这种可能性。对于触觉,新颖的平面形状的对称和重复检测速度相似。如果轮廓极性不匹配(保持客观性恒定),性能将显着下降,而与2个对象之间的比较:与1个对象内:外部之间的比较(保持轮廓极性恒定)存在适度的缺点。对于相同的视觉任务,对称性检测与触觉相似(轮廓极性不匹配的成本很高,两个对象之间的成本较弱:面对面比较),但是重复检测却有很大差异(轮廓极性不匹配的成本很低,优势明显) (用于2个对象之间的比较)。因此,对于触觉和视觉对称性检测以及对于触觉重复检测,客观性的影响都小于轮廓极性。但是,对于视觉重复检测,客观效果相反(在1对象内:外侧比较困难),并且比轮廓极性效果强。这种结果模式表明规律性检测反映了信息提取以及物理世界中的规律性分布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号