...
首页> 外文期刊>Attention, perception & psychophysics >The role of contour polarity, objectness, and regularities in haptic and visual perception
【24h】

The role of contour polarity, objectness, and regularities in haptic and visual perception

机译:轮廓极性,对象和规律在触觉和视觉感知中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Regularities like symmetry (mirror reflection) and repetition (translation) play an important role in both visual and haptic (active touch) shape perception. Altering figure-ground factors to change what is perceived as an object influences regularity detection. For vision, symmetry is usually easier to detect within one object, whereas repetition is easier to detect across two objects. For haptics, we have not found this interaction between regularity type and objectness (Cecchetto & Lawson, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 103-125, 2017; Lawson, Ajvani, & Cecchetto, Experimental Psychology, 63, 197-214, 2016). However, our studies used repetition stimuli with mismatched concavities, convexities, and luminance, and so had mismatched contour polarities. Such stimuli may be processed differently to stimuli with matching contour polarities. We investigated this possibility. For haptics, speeded symmetry and repetition detection for novel, planar shapes was similar. Performance deteriorated strikingly if contour polarity mismatched (keeping objectness constant), whilst there was a modest disadvantage for between-2objects:facing-sides compared to within-1object:outer-sides comparisons (keeping contour polarity constant). For the same task for vision, symmetry detection was similar to haptics (strong costs for mismatched contour polarity, weaker costs for between-2objects:facing-sides comparisons), but repetition detection was very different (weak costs for mismatched contour polarity, strong benefits for between-2objects:facing-sides comparisons). Thus, objectness was less influential than contour polarity for both haptic and visual symmetry detection, and for haptic repetition detection. However, for visual repetition detection, objectness effects reversed direction (within-1object:outer-sides comparisons were harder) and were stronger than contour polarity effects. This pattern of results suggests that regularity detection refl
机译:对称性(镜面反射)和重复(翻译)等规律在视觉和触觉(主动触摸)形状感知中起重要作用。改变图形因素以改变作为物体所感知的内容影响规律性检测。对于视觉,对称性通常更容易检测一个对象,而重复更容易检测到两个对象。对于触觉,我们还没有找到规律性类型和仇恨之间的这种互动(Cecchetto&Lawson,实验心理学杂志:人类感知和表现,43,103-125,2017; Lawson,Ajvani,&Cecchetto,实验心理学,63,197 -214,2016)。然而,我们的研究使用了重复刺激与错配的凹凸,凸起和亮度,因此具有不匹配的轮廓极性。可以将这种刺激与匹配轮廓极性的刺激不同。我们调查了这种可能性。对于触觉,对新颖的,平面形状的加速对称性和重复检测是相似的。如果轮廓极性不匹配(保持客观常数),则性能令人惊醒地恶化,而在-2Objects之间存在适度的缺点:面对面与1 object相比:外侧比较(保持轮廓极性恒定)。对于相同的视觉任务,对称检测类似于触觉(不匹配的轮廓极性的强成本,2Objects之间的成本较弱:侧面比较),但重复检测非常不同(不匹配的轮廓极性的成本较弱,强劲的效益用于 - 2Objects:面对面比较)。因此,对于触觉和视觉对称检测以及触觉重复检测,对象性比轮廓极性较小。然而,对于视觉重复检测,对象效应反转方向(在-1内的内部:外侧比较较难)并且比轮廓极性效应更强烈。这种结果模式表明规则性检测逆

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号