首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Claiming control: cooperation with return as a condition for social benefits in Austria and the Netherlands
【2h】

Claiming control: cooperation with return as a condition for social benefits in Austria and the Netherlands

机译:声称拥有控制权:以回报为基础的合作是奥地利和荷兰的社会福利条件

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Theoretically embedded in the migration/social policy nexus, this paper investigates cooperation with return (CWR) as a policy tool to remove practical deportation barriers for third-country nationals pending removal. Based on legal and policy documents and expert interviews with stakeholders in Austria and the Netherlands, the paper asks how CWR is implemented and what influence it has, both on migration control aims and on access to social rights. We argue that the politicization of the issue and diverging interests between policy networks of welfare and migration affect the regulation and implementation of the tool. By comparing the use of CWR within two country contexts, the analysis presented here adds valuable insights on features of governmental instruments in response to the “deportation gap”. The paper further adds to the literature on sanction-oriented, personalized migration policies.
机译:从理论上讲,该研究嵌入了移民/社会政策联系,调查了与回返(CWR)的合作,将其作为消除即将被遣散的第三国国民的实际驱逐出境障碍的政策工具。基于法律和政策文件以及对奥地利和荷兰利益相关者的专家访谈,本文询问了CWR的实施方式及其对移民控制目标和获得社会权利的影响。我们认为,问题的政治化和福利与移民政策网络之间的利益分歧影响了该工具的监管和实施。通过比较两个国家背景下CWR的使用,此处提出的分析为应对“驱逐出境差距”增加了对政府文书特征的宝贵见解。本文进一步将有关制裁的个性化移民政策添加到文献中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号