首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >A confidence interval analysis of sampling effort, sequencing depth, and taxonomic resolution of fungal community ecology in the era of high-throughput sequencing
【2h】

A confidence interval analysis of sampling effort, sequencing depth, and taxonomic resolution of fungal community ecology in the era of high-throughput sequencing

机译:高通量测序时代的真菌群落生态学采样工作,测序深度和分类学分辨率的置信区间分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

High-throughput sequencing technology has helped microbial community ecologists explore ecological and evolutionary patterns at unprecedented scales. The benefits of a large sample size still typically outweigh that of greater sequencing depths per sample for accurate estimations of ecological inferences. However, excluding or not sequencing rare taxa may mislead the answers to the questions ‘how and why are communities different?’ This study evaluates the confidence intervals of ecological inferences from high-throughput sequencing data of foliar fungal endophytes as case studies through a range of sampling efforts, sequencing depths, and taxonomic resolutions to understand how technical and analytical practices may affect our interpretations. Increasing sampling size reliably decreased confidence intervals across multiple community comparisons. However, the effects of sequencing depths on confidence intervals depended on how rare taxa influenced the dissimilarity estimates among communities and did not significantly decrease confidence intervals for all community comparisons. A comparison of simulated communities under random drift suggests that sequencing depths are important in estimating dissimilarities between microbial communities under neutral selective processes. Confidence interval analyses reveal important biases as well as biological trends in microbial community studies that otherwise may be ignored when communities are only compared for statistically significant differences.
机译:高通量测序技术已帮助微生物群落生态学家以前所未有的规模探索生态和进化模式。大样本量的好处通常仍然超过每个样本更大的测序深度所带来的好处,以准确估算生态推断。但是,排除或不对稀有生物分类进行测序可能会误导对“社区为何以及为什么会有差异?”这一问题的答案。本研究通过一系列案例研究,根据叶真菌内生菌的高通量测序数据评估了生态推断的置信区间。抽样工作,测序深度和分类学分辨率,以了解技术和分析实践如何影响我们的解释。样本数量的增加可靠地减少了跨多个社区比较的置信区间。但是,测序深度对置信区间的影响取决于稀有分类单元如何影响社区之间的相异性估计,并且并未显着降低所有社区比较的置信区间。对随机漂移下模拟群落的比较表明,测序深度对于评估中性选择性过程下微生物群落之间的差异非常重要。置信区间分析显示了微生物群落研究中的重要偏见和生物学趋势,如果仅对群落进行统计学上的显着差异进行比较,则可能会被忽略。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 PLoS Clinical Trials
  • 作者

    Ryoko Oono;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 2011(12),12
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 e0189796
  • 总页数 15
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号