首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Public Health >Behavior Evaluation Based on Electroencephalograph and Personality in a Simulated Driving Experiment
【2h】

Behavior Evaluation Based on Electroencephalograph and Personality in a Simulated Driving Experiment

机译:模拟驾驶实验中基于脑电图和人格的行为评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Assessments and predictions of driving behavior are very important to improve traffic safety. We hypothesized that there were some patterns of driving behaviors, and these patterns had some correlation with cognitive states and personalities. To test this hypothesis, an evaluation of driving status, based on electroencephalography (EEG) and steering behavior in a simulated driving experiment, was designed and performed. Unity 3D was utilized to design the simulated driving scene. A photoelectric encoder fixed on the steering wheel and the corresponding data collection, transmission, and storage device was developed by Arduino, to acquire the rotation direction, angle, angular velocity, and angular acceleration of the steering wheel. Biopac MP 150 was utilized to collect the EEG data simultaneously during driving. A total of 23 subjects (mean age 23.6 ± 1.3 years, driving years: 2.4 ± 1.6 years, 21 males and two females) participated in this study. The Fuzzy C-means algorithm (FCMA) was utilized to extract patterns of driving behavior and the cognitive state within the window width of 20 s. The behaviors were divided into five kinds, i.e., negative, normal, alert, stress, and violent behavior, respectively, based on the standard deviation of steering wheel data. The cognitive states were divided into four kinds, i.e., negative, calm, alert, and tension, respectively, based on the EEG data. The correlation of these data, together with the personality traits evaluated using Cattell 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) were analyzed using multiclass logistic regression. Results indicated the significance of the cognitive state and seven personality traits [apprehension (O), rule consciousness (G), reasoning (B), emotional stability (C), liveliness (F), vigilance (L), and perfectionism (Q3)] in predicting driving behaviors, and the prediction accuracy was 80.2%. The negative and alert cognitive states were highly correlated with dangerous driving, including negative and violent behaviors. Personality traits complicate the relationship with driving behaviors, which may vary across different types of subjects and traffic accidents.
机译:对驾驶行为的评估和预测对于提高交通安全非常重要。我们假设存在驾驶行为的某些模式,并且这些模式与认知状态和个性有关。为了验证该假设,设计并执行了基于脑电图(EEG)和模拟驾驶实验中的转向行为的驾驶状态评估。利用Unity 3D设计模拟的驾驶场景。 Arduino开发了固定在方向盘上的光电编码器以及相应的数据收集,传输和存储设备,以获取方向盘的旋转方向,角度,角速度和角加速度。在行驶过程中,Biopac MP 150用于同时收集EEG数据。共有23名受试者(平均年龄23.6±1.3岁,驾驶年龄:2.4±1.6岁,男性21位,女性2位)参加了这项研究。模糊C均值算法(FCMA)用于提取20 s窗口宽度内驾驶行为和认知状态的模式。根据方向盘数据的标准偏差,将行为分为负面行为,正常行为,警觉行为,压力行为和暴力行为五种。基于EEG数据,认知状态分别分为消极,平静,机敏和紧张四种。使用多类Logistic回归分析了这些数据的相关性,以及使用Cattell 16人格因子问卷(16PF)评估的人格特质。结果表明了认知状态和七个人格特质的重要性[忧虑(O),规则意识(G),推理(B),情绪稳定(C),活泼(F),警惕(L)和完美主义(Q3)在预测驾驶行为时,预测准确性为80.2%。负面和警觉的认知状态与危险驾驶高度相关,包括负面和暴力行为。人格特质使驾驶行为的关系复杂化,驾驶行为在不同类型的受试者和交通事故中可能会有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号