首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Nutrition >Is Grassfed Meat and Dairy Better for Human and Environmental Health?
【2h】

Is Grassfed Meat and Dairy Better for Human and Environmental Health?

机译:草食肉类和奶制品是否对人类和环境健康更好?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The health of livestock, humans, and environments is tied to plant diversity—and associated phytochemical richness—across landscapes. Health is enhanced when livestock forage on phytochemically rich landscapes, is reduced when livestock forage on simple mixture or monoculture pastures or consume high-grain rations in feedlots, and is greatly reduced for people who eat highly processed diets. Circumstantial evidence supports the hypothesis that phytochemical richness of herbivore diets enhances biochemical richness of meat and dairy, which is linked with human and environmental health. Among many roles they play in health, phytochemicals in herbivore diets protect meat and dairy from protein oxidation and lipid peroxidation that cause low-grade systemic inflammation implicated in heart disease and cancer in humans. Yet, epidemiological and ecological studies critical of red meat consumption do not discriminate among meats from livestock fed high-grain rations as opposed to livestock foraging on landscapes of increasing phytochemical richness. The global shift away from phytochemically and biochemically rich wholesome foods to highly processed diets enabled 2.1 billion people to become overweight or obese and increased the incidence of type II diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. Unimpeded, these trends will add to a projected substantial increase in greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) from producing food and clearing land by 2050. While agriculture contributes one quarter of GHGE, livestock can play a sizable role in climate mitigation. Of 80 ways to alleviate climate change, regenerative agriculture—managed grazing, silvopasture, tree intercropping, conservation agriculture, and farmland restoration—jointly rank number one as ways to sequester GHG. Mitigating the impacts of people in the Anthropocene can be enabled through diet to improve human and environmental health, but that will require profound changes in society. People will have to learn we are members of nature's communities. What we do to them, we do to ourselves. Only by nurturing them can we nurture ourselves.
机译:牲畜,人类和环境的健康与景观中的植物多样性以及相关的植物化学丰富度有关。当在富含化学化学物质的地貌上觅食牲畜时,健康会得到改善;在简单的混合饲料或单一种植牧场中觅食时,或在饲育场中消耗高粮量的牲畜时,它们的健康会降低;对于食用高度加工饮食的人来说,健康会大大降低。间接证据支持这样的假说:草食动物日粮的植物化学丰富性增强了肉类和奶制品的生物化学丰富性,这与人类和环境健康息息相关。它们在健康中发挥着许多作用,其中草食动物饮食中的植物化学物质可保护肉类和奶制品免受蛋白质氧化和脂质过氧化的影响,蛋白质氧化和脂质过氧化会导致与人类心脏病和癌症相关的低度全身性炎症。然而,对食用红肉的批判的流行病学和生态学研究并未区分以高粮饲喂的牲畜的肉,这与牲畜在植物化学丰富度不断提高的景观上觅食相反。全球已经从富含植物化学和生物化学的健康食品转向高度加工的饮食,这使21亿人变得超重或肥胖,并增加了II型糖尿病,心脏病和癌症的发病率。毫无疑问,这些趋势将使到2050年生产粮食和开垦土地产生的温室气体排放量(GHGE)大幅增加。尽管农业占GHGE的四分之一,但牲畜在缓解气候变化方面可发挥相当大的作用。在缓解气候变化的80种方法中,再生农业(管理放牧,林牧,间种,保护性农业和农田恢复)共同成为隔离温室气体的第一名。饮食可以减轻人类对人类的影响,从而改善人类和环境健康,但这将需要社会的深刻变革。人们将必须学习我们是自然界的成员。我们对他们所做的,我们对自己所做的。只有培育他们,我们才能培育自己。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号