首页> 外文期刊>Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition >Meat, eggs, full-fat dairy, and nutritional boogeymen: Does the way in which animals are raised affect health differently in humans?
【24h】

Meat, eggs, full-fat dairy, and nutritional boogeymen: Does the way in which animals are raised affect health differently in humans?

机译:肉,鸡蛋,全脂乳品和营养鲣鸟:在人类中饲养动物的饲养影响吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Food recommendations to improve cancer prevention are generally based on epidemiologic data and remain inconsistent. These epidemiologic studies, while controversial, have generally produced results that caution against the consumption of high-fat foods, including eggs, red meat, and full-fat dairy, such as butter and cheese. Yet, limited data exist assessing the quality of individual sources of these foods and the effect each has after its consumption. This study set out to assess the impact sources of food within the same groups from animals raised differently on variables associated with health in human studies. Methods and Materials: A search was conducted through MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed. In total, twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, measuring physiologic changes in humans after consuming animal products following animal diet manipulation. A meta-analysis was attempted to assess the differences between the cohorts in these studies, but was aborted due to poor study quality, vast differences in study design, and a limited number of studies. Results: Studies varied by animal, animal diet manipulation, food product, and overall design. Significant differences were present between groups eating the same food (cheese, beef, eggs, and butter) from animals raised differently, including levels of: conjugated linoleic acid, omega-3 fatty acids (alpha linoleic acid [ALA], docosahexaenoic acid [DHA], and eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA]), and inflammatory factors (triacyl glycerol [TAG], interleukin-6 [IL-6], interleukin-8 [IL-8], tumor necrosis factor [TNF], and C-reactive protein [CRP]). Lipid levels were minimally affected. Conclusions: This work highlights differences in human health markers after consumption of the same foods from animals raised differently. Overall, lipid levels remained relatively neutral, but significant changes in inflammatory and other serum markers and phospholipids were present. Future studies and dietary recommendations should consider how animals are raised, as this can produce different effects on health markers.
机译:背景:改善癌症预防的食物建议通常基于流行病学数据并保持不一致。这些流行病学研究虽然有争议,但通常产生了谨慎消耗高脂食品的结果,包括鸡蛋,红肉和全脂乳制品,如黄油和奶酪。然而,存在有限的数据,评估这些食物的个体来源的质量,并且每个消费后的效果都有。本研究提出了评估与人类研究中与健康相关的不同群体的相同组内的食物的影响来源。方法和材料:通过Medline,Embase和PubMed进行搜索。共有二十九项研究符合纳入标准,在动物饮食操作后消耗动物产品后测量人类的生理变化。荟萃分析试图评估这些研究中的群组之间的差异,而是由于学习质量差,研究设计差异以及有限数量的研究而中止。结果:动物,动物饮食操纵,食品和整体设计等各种研究。群体之间存在显着的差异,这些团体与不同的食物(奶酪,牛肉,鸡蛋和黄油)不同,包括不同的动物,包括:缀合的亚油酸,ω-3脂肪酸(α亚油酸[Ala],二十二磺酰己酸[DHA [Eicosapentaeno酸[EPA])和炎症因子(三酰甘油[标签],白细胞介素-6 [IL-6],白细胞介素-8 [IL-8],肿瘤坏死因子[TNF]和C反应蛋白[CRP])。脂质水平较近受到影响。结论:这项工作突出了从不同地饲养的动物食用后的人体健康标志物的差异。总体而言,脂质水平仍然相对中性,但存在炎症和其他血清标记物和磷脂的显着变化。未来的研究和膳食建议应考虑如何提出动物,因为这会对健康标志物产生不同的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号