首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Otolaryngology >Ludwigs Angina—A Controversial Surgical Emergency: How We Do It
【2h】

Ludwigs Angina—A Controversial Surgical Emergency: How We Do It

机译:路德维希的心绞痛-有争议的外科急诊:我们如何做

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives. To review the current protocols used for management of Ludwig's angina and to assess the efficacy of conservative measures in these cases. Methods. A retrospective review of patients who were admitted to our institution for management of Ludwig's angina between 2003 and 2010. Results. Two patients were identified. Both were managed successfully with conservative measures and close airway observation. None needed an emergency intubation or surgical tracheostomy. There were no mortalities, and both had a short hospital stay. Conclusion. Recently, management of Ludwig's angina has evolved from aggressive airway management into a more conservative one. This is based on close airway observation on a specialised airway unit and a serial clinical airway assessment. Improved imaging modalities, antibiotic therapy, surgical skills, and clinical experience are the key factors behind this change in practice.
机译:目标。回顾当前用于治疗路德维希型心绞痛的方案,并评估在这些情况下采取保守措施的有效性。方法。回顾性回顾了2003年至2010年间进入我院治疗路德维希心绞痛的患者。结果。确定了两名患者。两者均通过保守措施和近距离气道观察得以成功管理。没有人需要紧急插管或手术气管切开术。没有人死亡,而且都短暂住院。结论。最近,路德维希(Ludwig)心绞痛的管理已从积极的气道管理演变为更为保守的方法。这是基于在专用气道设备上进行的近距离气道观察和一系列临床气道评估。改进的成像方式,抗生素治疗,手术技能和临床经验是这种改变的关键因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号