首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Animal Science >Performance and welfare of steers housed on concrete slatted floors at fixed and dynamic (allometric based) space allowances
【2h】

Performance and welfare of steers housed on concrete slatted floors at fixed and dynamic (allometric based) space allowances

机译:固定和动态(基于等高线)空间的混凝土板条地板上ers牛皮的性能和福利

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objectives of the study were to determine whether allometric equations are suitable for estimating the space requirements of finishing beef cattle housed on concrete slatted floors (>CSF) and to examine the effect of fixed and dynamic space allowances on the performance and welfare of these cattle. Continental crossbred steers [n = 120: mean initial live weight, 590 (SD 29.8) kg] were blocked by breed, weight, and age and assigned to 1 of 5 space allowance treatments (3 fixed and 2 dynamic) on CSF: 1) 2.0 m2 per animal, 2) 2.5 m2 per animal, 3) 3.0 m2 per animal, 4) Equation 1 (E1); y = 0.033w0.667, where y = m2 per animal and w = body weight, and 5) Equation 2 (E2); y = 0.048w0.667. The length of the feed face was 3.0 m for all treatments. Steers were offered grass silage and concentrates ad libitum. DMI was recorded weekly on a pen basis. Steers were weighed and dirt scored every 14 d. Blood samples were collected every 28 d, and analyzed for complete cell counts. Behavior was recorded using closed-circuit infrared cameras. Steers’ hooves were inspected for lesions at the beginning of the study and post-slaughter. Slaughter weight and ADG were lowest, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) was poorest, for steers accommodated at 2.0 m2, and slaughter weight and ADG were greatest, and FCR was the best, for steers accommodated at E2 (P < 0.05); steers accommodated at 2.5 m2 were intermediate (P > 0.05) to those accommodated at 2.0 m2 and both 3.0 m2 and E1, whereas steers accommodated at 3.0 m2 and E1 were intermediate (P > 0.05) to 2.5 m2 and E2. Carcass weight of steers housed at 2.0 m2 was lower (P < 0.05) than all other treatments. Steers housed at 2.5 m2 had lower carcass weights (P < 0.05) than those with accommodated at E1 and E2, whereas the carcass weight of steers accommodated at 3.0 m2 was intermediate. Carcass fat scores and hide weights were lower (P < 0.05) in steers accommodated at 2.0 m2 than those housed at E2 with other treatments being intermediate. The number of steers lying at any one time and the number of steers observed grooming themselves was lower (P < 0.05) at 2.0 m2 than any other treatment. Dirt scores, hoof lesion number, and hematological measurements were not affected by treatment. It was concluded that 2.0 m2 per animal was an insufficient space allowance for housing finishing beef steers and that the equation y = 0.033w0.667 is sufficient for estimating the space required by finishing beef cattle housed on CSF.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定等速方程是否适合估算混凝土板条地板(> CSF )上肥育肉牛的空间需求,并研究固定空间和动态空间配额对牛肉的影响。这些牛的性能和福利。大陆杂交种ers牛[n = 120:平均初始活重590(SD 29.8)kg]被品种,体重和年龄所限制,并在CSF上分配了5种空间补贴处理方法中的1种(3种固定和2种动态处理):每只动物2.0 m 2 ,2)每只动物2.5 m 2 ,3)每只动物3.0 m 2 ,4)等式1(E1) ; y = 0.033w 0.667 ,其中y =每只动物m 2 ,w =体重,以及5)公式2(E2); y = 0.048w 0.667 。所有处理的进料面长度均为3.0 m。向牛提供草青贮饲料和任意浓缩饲料。 DMI每周以笔记录一次。每14天称重牛,并记下灰尘。每28天收集一次血样,并分析完整细胞计数。使用闭路红外摄像机记录行为。在研究开始时和屠宰后检查牛的蹄是否有损伤。在2.0 m 2 的公牛中,屠宰体重和ADG最低,饲料转化率(FCR)最差,而在2.0 m 2 时,屠宰体重和ADG最大,而FCR最好。 E2(P <0.05); 2.5 m 2 容纳的ers牛与2.0 m 2 容纳3.0 m 2 和E1的ers牛处于中间(P> 0.05)在3.0 m 2 和E1处的牛皮处于中间(P> 0.05)至2.5 m 2 和E2。饲养在2.0 m 2 的>牛weight体重量比其他所有处理方法均低(P <0.05)。放置在2.5 m 2 的牛的car体重量(P <0.05)比在E1和E2放置的accommodate牛的lower体重量低(P <0.05),而在3.0 m 2 的accommodate牛car体的重量则低。中间。饲养在2.0 m 2 的公牛的体脂肪评分和生皮重量低于(E <2)在其他处理中间的with牛。在2.0 m 2 处,一次躺着的ste牛数量和观察到的修饰自己的ste牛数量均低于其他任何处理(P <0.05)。污垢评分,蹄部病变数目和血液学指标不受治疗的影响。得出的结论是,每只动物2.0 m 2 不足以容纳肥牛肥育场,而方程y = 0.033w 0.667 足以估算所需的空间。整理饲养在CSF上的肉牛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号