首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Healthcare >Clinical Factors Associated with COVID-19 Severity in Mexican Patients: Cross-Sectional Analysis from a Multicentric Hospital Study
【2h】

Clinical Factors Associated with COVID-19 Severity in Mexican Patients: Cross-Sectional Analysis from a Multicentric Hospital Study

机译:墨西哥患者Covid-19严重程度相关的临床因素:多中心医院研究的横截面分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

(1) Background: Latin America has been harshly hit by SARS-CoV-2, but reporting from this region is still incomplete. This study aimed at identifying and comparing clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 at different stages of disease severity. (2) Methods: Cross-sectional multicentric study. Individuals with nasopharyngeal PCR were categorized into four groups: (1) negative, (2) positive, not hospitalized, (3) positive, hospitalized with/without supplementary oxygen, and (4) positive, intubated. Clinical and laboratory data were compared, using group 1 as the reference. Multivariate multinomial logistic regression was used to compare adjusted odds ratios. (3) Results: Nine variables remained in the model, explaining 76% of the variability. Men had increased odds, from 1.90 (95%CI 0.87–4.15) in the comparison of 2 vs. 1, to 3.66 (1.12–11.9) in 4 vs. 1. Diabetes and obesity were strong predictors. For diabetes, the odds for groups 2, 3, and 4 were 1.56 (0.29–8.16), 12.8 (2.50–65.8), and 16.1 (2.87–90.2); for obesity, these were 0.79 (0.31–2.05), 3.38 (1.04–10.9), and 4.10 (1.16–14.4), respectively. Fever, myalgia/arthralgia, cough, dyspnea, and neutrophilia were associated with the more severe COVID-19 group. Anosmia/dysgeusia were more likely to occur in group 2 (25.5; 2.51–259). (4) Conclusion: The results point to relevant differences in clinical and laboratory features of COVID-19 by level of severity that can be used in medical practice.
机译:(1)背景:拉丁美洲已被SARS-COV-2严厉打击,但从该地区的报告仍然不完整。本研究旨在鉴定和比较疾病严重程度不同阶段Covid-19患者的临床特征。 (2)方法:横截面多中心研究。具有鼻咽PCR的个体分为四组:(1)阴性,(2)阳性,不住院,(3)阳性,住院/无补充氧,(4)阳性,管道。比较临床和实验室数据,使用第1组作为参考。多变量多项式逻辑回归用于比较调整后的差距。 (3)结果:模型中九变量留在,解释了76%的变异性。男性在比较中的1.90(95%CI 0.87-4.15)中的赔率增加了2与1,到3.66(1.12-11.9),在4个与1.糖尿病和肥胖症是强有力的预测因素。对于糖尿病,第2,3和4组的赔率为1.56(0.29-8.16),12.8(2.5.55.8)和16.1(2.87-90.2);对于肥胖,它们分别为0.79(0.31-2.05),3.38(1.04-10.9)和4.10(1.16-14.4)。发烧,肌痛/关节痛,咳嗽,呼吸困难和中性粒细胞与更严重的Covid-19组有关。在第2组(25.5; 2.51-259)中更有可能发生Anosmia /痢疾。 (4)结论:结果指出了Covid-19的临床和实验室特征的相关差异,通过可用于医疗实践的严重程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号