首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Blood-Flow Restriction Resistance Exercise for Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial
【2h】

Blood-Flow Restriction Resistance Exercise for Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

机译:老年人膝骨关节炎的血流阻力抵抗运动:一项随机临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In a pilot randomized clinical trial, participants aged ≥60 years (n = 35) with physical limitations and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) were randomized to 12 weeks of lower-body low-load resistance training with blood-flow restriction (BFR) or moderate-intensity resistance training (MIRT) to evaluate changes in muscle strength, pain, and physical function. Four exercises were performed three times per week to volitional fatigue using 20% and 60% of one repetition maximum (1RM). Study outcomes included knee extensor strength, gait speed, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) performance, and pain via the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC). Per established guidance for pilot studies, primary analyses for the trial focused on safety, feasibility, and effect sizes/95% confidence intervals of dependent outcomes to inform a fully-powered trial. Across three speeds of movement, the pre- to post-training change in maximal isokinetic peak torque was 9.96 (5.76, 14.16) Nm while the mean difference between groups (BFR relative to MIRT) was −1.87 (−10.96, 7.23) Nm. Most other directionally favored MIRT, though more spontaneous reports of knee pain were observed (n = 14) compared to BFR (n = 3). BFR may have lower efficacy than MIRT in this context—though a fully-powered trial is needed to definitively address this hypothesis.
机译:在一项先导的随机临床试验中,年龄≥60岁(n = 35),身体受限和有症状的膝骨性关节炎(OA)的参与者被随机分配到有血流受限(BFR)的下半身低负荷阻力训练12周或中强度抵抗训练(MIRT)以评估肌肉力量,疼痛和身体功能的变化。每周进行3次四次运动,以达到最大程度的疲劳疲劳,一次重复最大值(1RM)分别为20%和60%。研究结果包括膝伸肌力量,步态速度,短暂体能表现(SPPB)表现和西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学OA指数(WOMAC)引起的疼痛。根据已建立的先导研究指南,该试验的主要分析重点在于安全性,可行性和效果大小/相关结果的95%置信区间,以为功能全面的试验提供信息。在三种运动速度下,训练前至训练后最大等速运动峰值扭矩的变化为9.96(5.76,14.16)Nm,而各组之间的平均差(相对于MIRT的BFR)为-1.87(-10.96,7.23)Nm。尽管观察到更多自发的膝关节疼痛报告(n = 14),而BFR(n = 3),但大多数其他方向性MIRT疗法都被认为是MIRT。在这种情况下,BFR的疗效可能比MIRT低-尽管需要彻底的试验来明确地解决这一假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号