首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Diagnostics >Exercise-Based Muscle Development Programmes and Their Effectiveness in the Functional Recovery of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review
【2h】

Exercise-Based Muscle Development Programmes and Their Effectiveness in the Functional Recovery of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review

机译:锻炼的肌肉发展计划及其在旋转袖口肌腱病变功能恢复中的有效性:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

(1) Background: Rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy causes pain and functional limitation of the shoulder. Physical exercises are effective therapies but there is no consensus on which exercise programme is the most appropriate. Objective: To analyze and compare the effectiveness of different intervention modalities-based exclusively on physical exercise muscle-development programs to improve shoulder pain and function in RC tendinopathy. (2) Methods: Systematic review (PRISMA) through a search in PubMed, WOS, PEDro, Cinahl, Scopus and Dialnet. The PEDro Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias analyzed the methodological quality. A pre-established table collected data on: patients, interventions, outcome measures and results. A narrative synthesis of the results was conducted. (3) Results: eight articles were selected (Cochrane: low risk of bias; PEDro: good quality). All assessed programs were effective. Only one study found statistically and clinically significant differences in favour of eccentric training. The exercises used were: eccentric/concentric/conventional, open/closed kinetic chain, with/without co-activation of glenohumeral muscle, with/without pain, and in clinic/at home. (4) Conclusions: All exercise programs were effective in RC tendinopathy, improving pain and shoulder function. No solid results were obtained when the interventions were compared due to their heterogeneity. Patients perception assessment tools were the most widely used. Amount of load applied should be considered.
机译:(1)背景:转子袖口(RC)肌腱病变导致肩部的疼痛和功能限制。体育锻炼是有效的疗法,但没有达成共识,行使计划是最合适的。目的:分析和比较不同干预方式的有效性 - 完全基于体育锻炼肌肉发展方案,提高休闲腹痛的肩痛和功能。 (2)方法:通过搜索PubMed,WOS,Pedro,Cinahl,Scopus和Dialnet搜索系统评价(Prisma)。佩罗级和偏倚的Cochrane风险分析了方法质量。预先建立的表收集了数据:患者,干预,结果措施和结果。进行了结果的叙事合成。 (3)结果:选择八篇文章(Cochrane:低偏差风险; PEDRO:优质)。所有评估的计划都有效。只有一项研究发现统计上和临床上的差异,有利于偏心训练。使用的锻炼是:偏心/同心/常规,开/闭式动力链,用/无共激活胶质肿块肌肉,带有/没有疼痛,在诊所/家中。 (4)结论:所有运动方案都在RC肌腱病变,改善疼痛和肩部功能。当由于其异质性比较干预时,没有获得固体结果。患者感知评估工具是最广泛使用的。应考虑施加的负荷量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号