首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Blood Advances >Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis of the upper extremity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy
【2h】

Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis of the upper extremity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy

机译:上肢深静脉血栓形成的诊断:测试准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) accounts for ≤10% of DVT and can be associated with morbidity and mortality. Accurate diagnosis and treatment are necessary for safe and effective patient management. We systematically reviewed the accuracy of D-dimer and duplex ultrasonography (US) for the evaluation of suspected first-episode UEDVT. We searched the Cochrane Central Register, OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed for eligible studies, reference lists of relevant reviews, registered trials, and relevant conference proceedings. We included prospective cross-sectional and cohort studies that evaluated test accuracy. Two investigators independently screened and collected data. The risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. We pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. The review included 9 studies. The pooled estimates for D-dimer sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.99) and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.43-0.52), respectively. The pooled estimates for duplex US sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.73-0.94) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.72-0.93), respectively. Certainty of evidence was moderate. In this review, we summarized the test accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of D-dimer and duplex US for this indication. The sensitivity and specificity of the tests found in the present review should be considered in the context of whether they are used alone or in combination, which is dependent on the prevalence of disease in the population, the clinical setting in which the patient is being evaluated, cost, potential harms, and patient outcomes. This study was registered at PROSPERO as Systematic Review Registration Number CRD42018098488.
机译:上肢深静脉血栓形成(UEDVT)占DVT的≤10%,并可能与发病率和死亡率相关。准确的诊断和治疗对于安全有效的患者管理必不可少。我们系统地评估了D二聚体和双工超声(US)的准确性,以评估可疑的第一集UEDVT。我们在Cochrane中央注册簿,OVID MEDLINE,EMBASE和PubMed中进行搜索,以寻找合格的研究,相关评论的参考清单,注册的试验以及相关的会议记录。我们纳入了评估测试准确性的前瞻性横断面研究和队列研究。两名调查员独立筛选并收集了数据。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2评估偏倚的风险,并使用建议评估,制定和评估框架对证据的确定性进行评估。我们汇总了敏感性和特异性的估计。该评价包括9项研究。 D-二聚体敏感性和特异性的合并估计分别为0.96(95%置信区间[CI],0.87-0.99)和0.47(95%CI,0.43-0.52)。双链体美国敏感性和特异性的汇总估计分别为0.87(95%CI,0.73-0.94)和0.85(95%CI,0.72-0.93)。证据的确定性是中等的。在这篇综述中,我们总结了D-二聚体和双链体US在该适应症中的测试准确性(敏感性和特异性)。在本评价中发现的测试的敏感性和特异性应在单独使用还是组合使用的情况下加以考虑,这取决于人群中疾病的流行程度,正在评估患者的临床环境,费用,潜在危害和患者预后。该研究已在PROSPERO注册为系统评价注册编号CRD42018098488。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号