首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >The Effects of Assisted and Resisted Plyometric Training Programs on Vertical Jump Performance in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【2h】

The Effects of Assisted and Resisted Plyometric Training Programs on Vertical Jump Performance in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:辅助和抵抗式体能训练计划对成人垂直跳动作的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Traditional, assisted and resisted plyometrics are considered to be effective training methods for improving vertical jump performance. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare effectiveness of traditional, assisted and resisted plyometric methods on vertical jumping ability in adults. Available literature was searched using MEDLINE (via EBSCO), SPORTDiscus (via EBSCO), Scopus and Web of Science databases. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the PEDro scale. Peer-reviewed studies were accepted only if they met all eligibility criteria: (a) healthy adults mean age > 18 years (b) training program based on plyometric exercises (c) the study reported on vertical jump height for the countermovement jump or drop jump performance. Of the 5092 articles identified, 17 studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative analyses. Both funnel plot analysis and Egger's test (p = 0.04) indicated publication bias for the comparison of resisted plyometrics and control condition. No publication bias was found for the other meta-analyses (p > 0.05). The effects of the traditional and assisted plyometric methods, when compared with the control condition (a non-plyometric condition), on jump height were moderate (SMD = 0.68, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.99, p < 0.0001; SMD = 0.70, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.20, p = 0.006, respectively). The effects of the resisted plyometric methods, when compared with the control condition, on a jump height was small (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.79, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences between the training effects of the assisted and traditional plyometric interventions on jump height (SMD = 0.62, 95% CI -1.66 to 2.91, p = 0.59), nor between the resisted and traditional plyometric training programs (SMD = 0.2, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.23, p = 0.86). Traditional, assisted and resisted plyometric methods are effective training modalities for augmenting vertical jump performance in healthy adults. Resisted and assisted plyometric methods are equally effective as the traditional plyometric method in improving vertical jumping ability in healthy adults.
机译:传统的,辅助的和抵制的体能测量法被认为是用于改善垂直跳跃性能的有效训练方法。该系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是比较传统的,辅助的和抵制的计测方法对成年人垂直跳跃能力的有效性。使用MEDLINE(通过EBSCO),SPORTDiscus(通过EBSCO),Scopus和Web of Science数据库搜索可用文献。研究的方法学质量使用PEDro量表进行评估。同行评议的研究只有在满足所有资格标准后才能被接受:(a)健康成年人的平均年龄> 18岁(b)基于测压练习的训练计划(c)该研究报告了针对反跳或跌倒的垂直跳高性能。在确定的5092篇文章中,定性和定量分析包括17项研究。漏斗图分析和Egger检验(p = 0.04)均表明了公布的偏倚,用于比较抗风速测定法和对照条件。其他荟萃分析未发现偏倚(p> 0.05)。与对照条件(非测厚条件)相比,传统的辅助测厚方法对跳跃高度的影响中等(SMD = 0.68,95%CI 0.37至0.99,p <0.0001; SMD = 0.70,95 %CI分别为0.20至1.20,p = 0.006)。与对照条件相比,阻力计测法对跳跃高度的影响很小(SMD = 0.48,95%CI 0.17至0.79,p = 0.002)。辅助的和传统的体能测量干预措施对跳跃高度的训练效果(SMD = 0.62,95%CI -1.66至2.91,p = 0.59)之间,以及抵制的和传统的体能测量干预方案(SMD = 0.2)之间均无显着差异。 ,95%CI -0.19至0.23,p = 0.86)。传统的,辅助的和抵制的体能测定法是有效的训练方法,可增强健康成年人的垂直跳高表现。抵抗和辅助的体测法在改善健康成年人的垂直跳跃能力方面与传统的体测法一样有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号