首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Children >Conducting Psychosocial Intervention Research among Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: Lessons from the PRISM Randomized Clinical Trial
【2h】

Conducting Psychosocial Intervention Research among Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: Lessons from the PRISM Randomized Clinical Trial

机译:在青少年癌症患者中进行社会心理干预研究:PRISM随机临床试验的经验教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer have poor psychosocial outcomes, in part because their limited participation in clinical trials precludes intervention-testing. We previously reported results of a successful randomized trial testing an AYA-targeted psychosocial intervention. Here, we aimed to describe strategies learned during the trial’s conduct. Methods: We summarized data from the medical record and staff field notes regarding reasons for participationon-participation. We conducted two focus groups with study staff; directed content analyses identified strategies for success. Results: 92 AYAs enrolled (77% of approached; = 50 Usual Care (control), = 49 PRISM (intervention)). In eligible families who declined participation ( = 22 AYAs, = 8 parents), the AYAs more commonly had advanced cancer ( = 11 (37%) declined vs. = 25 (26%) enrolled). AYA reasons for non-enrollment were predominantly “not interested”; parents worried participation was “too burdensome.” Staff strategies for accrual included having significant time to introduce the study and underscoring a desire to learn from the patient. After enrollment, AYAs who discontinued participation were more commonly assigned to control ( = 5 (10%) control vs. = 2 (4%) intervention). Only = 1 AYA chose to discontinue participation after receiving the intervention. Conclusions: Efforts to engage AYAs prior to and during studies may help with accrual and retention.
机译:背景:患有癌症的青少年(AYAs)的社会心理结果较差,部分原因是由于他们对临床试验的参与有限,无法进行干预测试。我们之前曾报道过一项成功的随机试验的结果,该试验测试了针对AYA的心理社会干预措施。在这里,我们旨在描述在试验过程中学习到的策略。方法:我们总结了病历和工作人员现场记录中有关参与/不参与原因的数据。我们与研究人员进行了两个焦点小组讨论;有针对性的内容分析确定了成功的策略。结果:登记了92例AYA(接近方法的77%; = 50个常规护理(对照),= 49个PRISM(干预))。在拒绝参与的合格家庭中(= 22个AYA,= 8个父母),该AYA更常见于晚期癌症(= 11个(37%)拒绝,而25个(26%)参加)。 AYA拒绝入学的原因主要是“不感兴趣”。父母担心参与“太累了”。员工的应计策略包括有大量时间介绍这项研究,并强调了向患者学习的愿望。入组后,中断参与的AYAs更常分配为对照(= 5(10%)对照vs. = 2(4%)干预)。只有= 1个AYA在接受干预后选择中止参与。结论:在研究之前和研究期间进行AYA的努力可能有助于增加和保留。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号