Study of Abbott Toxo IMx system for detection of immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M toxoplasma antibodies: value of confirmatory testing for diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis.

摘要

We compared the Abbott Toxo immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM IMx assays with the Sabin-Feldman dye test and an IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 398 serum samples previously tested in our laboratory (retrospective group) and 1,000 consecutive serum samples, tested as they were received in our laboratory in 1995 (prospective group). In the retrospective group, the IgG IMx had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 99.0%, positive predictive value of 99.0%, negative predictive value of 100%, and overall agreement of 99.5%. The percentages for the IgM IMx were 97.8, 99.0, 98.9, 98, and 98.4%, respectively. In the prospective group, the IgG IMx had a sensitivity of 97.8%, specificity of 98.7%, positive predictive value of 97.8%, negative predictive value of 98.7%, and overall agreement of 98.4%. The percentages for the IgM IMx were 88.3, 95.9, 74.7, 98.3, and 95%. A serological profile (IgA and IgE antibodies and the differential agglutination [AC/HS] test) was performed in an attempt to resolve discrepancies. Of 21 serum samples that were positive in the IgM IMx and negative in the IgM ELISA, 19 had serological profiles which were most compatible with an infection acquired in the distant past. Of 8 serum samples which were positive in the IgM ELISA and negative in the IgM IMx, 5 had serological profiles which were most compatible with an infection acquired in the distant past. Of the 55 serum samples that were positive in both IgM tests, 21 were from patients who had serological profiles which were most compatible with an infection acquired in the distal past. In conclusion, our data highlight the importance of confirmatory testing for the diagnosis of recently acquired infection with Toxoplasma gondii. When compared with the dye test and IgM ELISA, the Toxo IgG and IgM IMx assays, respectively, revealed high overall agreement in the retrospective and prospective study.