首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Evaluation of three immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from asymptomatic males.
【2h】

Evaluation of three immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from asymptomatic males.

机译:评估三种免疫测定方法以检测无症状男性尿液样本中的沙眼衣原体。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The performances of three commercially available immunoassays (Chlamydiazyme/Antibody Blocking Assay [Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, Ill.], IDEIA [Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.], and Microtrak EIA [Syva Co. Palo Alto, Calif.]) were evaluated for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from asymptomatic males. Assay results were compared with direct specimen immunofluorescence (DFA) analysis of urine sediment (Syva Microtrak; Syva Co.), which was chosen as the study confirmation assay. An overall Chlamydia prevalence of 7% (24 of 340) was found in our study population, with peak incidences occurring in the adolescent (8 of 93 specimens) and young adult (11 of 146 specimens) age groups. Sensitivity and specificity data among the Chlamydiazyme, IDEIA, and Microtrak enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) were determined to be 79.1 and 99%, 91.7 and 98%, and 95.8 and 99%, respectively. The Microtrak EIA and IDEIA products demonstrated sensitivities and specificities equal to or greater than those claimed for urine specimens. The diagnostic accuracies of these assays on asymptomatic subjects, along with the ease of this collection method, suggest a role for these products as screening tools. The sensitivity of the Chlamydiazyme assay was lower than that claimed previously in symptomatic patients, with 5 of 24 positive specimens demonstrating false-negative results. In those cases, centrifugation of the original immunoassay aliquot material and then DFA examination confirmed specimen positivity. Urine immunoassay screening in combination with DFA confirmation (which was chosen because it has antibody epitopic specificity different from that of the primary assay) provides a high degree of diagnostic precision. The use of noninvasive collection methods could result in greater testing compliance among asymptomatic males and, subsequently, could reduce the incidences of both symptomatic and silent chlamydial infections.
机译:评估了三种市售免疫测定法(衣原体酶/抗体阻断测定法[伊利诺伊州艾伯特公园的艾伯特诊断公司],IDEIA [纽约州普莱恩维尤市的Analytab Products]和Microtrak EIA [加利福尼亚州帕洛阿尔托的Syva公司]的性能。用于检测无症状男性尿液样本中的沙眼衣原体。将测定结果与尿沉渣的直接标本免疫荧光(DFA)分析(Syva Microtrak; Syva Co.)进行了比较,该分析被选作研究确认试验。在我们的研究人群中,衣原体的总体患病率为7%(340个中的24个),其中青少年(93个样本中的8个)和年轻人(146个样本中的11个)年龄组的发病率最高。衣原体酶,IDEIA和Microtrak酶免疫测定(EIA)之间的灵敏度和特异性数据分别确定为79.1%和99%,91.7和98%,95.8和99%。 Microtrak EIA和IDEIA产品显示出的敏感性和特异性等于或大于对尿液标本要求的敏感性和特异性。这些试验对无症状受试者的诊断准确性以及这种收集方法的简便性,暗示了这些产品作为筛选工具的作用。衣原体酶测定的灵敏度低于有症状患者的灵敏度,在24例阳性样本中有5例显示假阴性结果。在这些情况下,先将原始免疫分析等分材料离心,然后再进行DFA检查,即可确认样品阳性。结合DFA确认进行尿液免疫分析筛选(之所以选择该方法是因为它具有与主要分析方法不同的抗体表位特异性),可提供高度的诊断精度。使用无创采集方法可以提高无症状男性的测试依从性,从而可以减少有症状和无症状的衣原体感染的发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号