首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Non-linguistic learning and aphasia: Evidence from a paired associate and feedback-based task
【2h】

Non-linguistic learning and aphasia: Evidence from a paired associate and feedback-based task

机译:非语言的学习和失语:来自配对联想和基于反馈的任务

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Though aphasia is primarily characterized by impairments in the comprehension and/or expression of language, research has shown that patients with aphasia also show deficits in cognitive-linguistic domains such as attention, executive function, concept knowledge and memory ( for review). Research in aphasia suggests that cognitive impairments can impact the online construction of language, new verbal learning, and transactional success (; ; ). In our research, we extend this hypothesis to suggest that general cognitive deficits influence progress with therapy. The aim of our study is to explore learning, a cognitive process that is integral to relearning language, yet underexplored in the field of aphasia rehabilitation. We examine non-linguistic category learning in patients with aphasia (n=19) and in healthy controls (n=12), comparing feedback and non-feedback based instruction. Participants complete two computer-based learning tasks that require them to categorize novel animals based on the percentage of features shared with one of two prototypes. As hypothesized, healthy controls showed successful category learning following both methods of instruction. In contrast, only 60% of our patient population demonstrated successful non-linguistic category learning. Patient performance was not predictable by standardized measures of cognitive ability. Results suggest that general learning is affected in aphasia and is a unique, important factor to consider in the field of aphasia rehabilitation.
机译:尽管失语症的主要特征是语言的理解和/或表达受损,但研究表明,失语症患者的认知语言领域也表现出缺陷,例如注意力,执行功能,概念知识和记忆力(供审查)。对失语症的研究表明,认知障碍可能会影响在线语言的构建,新的语言学习和交易成功(;;)。在我们的研究中,我们扩展了这一假设,以表明一般的认知缺陷会影响治疗的进展。我们研究的目的是探索学习,这是学习语言所不可或缺的认知过程,但在失语症康复领域尚未得到充分研究。我们比较失语症患者(n = 19)和健康对照组(n = 12)的非语言类别学习,比较反馈和基于非反馈的指导。参与者完成了两项基于计算机的学习任务,要求他们根据与两个原型之一共享的特征的百分比对新颖的动物进行分类。如所假设的,健康的对照者遵循两种教学方法均显示出成功的类别学习。相比之下,只有60%的患者群体显示出成功的非语言类别学习。标准化的认知能力无法预测患者的表现。结果表明,失语症会影响普通学习,这是失语症康复领域要考虑的独特而重要的因素。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(51),1
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 79–90
  • 总页数 29
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号