首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Empirical Assessment of Spatial Prediction Methods for Location Cost Adjustment Factors
【2h】

Empirical Assessment of Spatial Prediction Methods for Location Cost Adjustment Factors

机译:对于位置费用调整因素空间预测方法的实证评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the feasibility stage, the correct prediction of construction costs ensures that budget requirements are met from the start of a project's lifecycle. A very common approach for performing quick-order-of-magnitude estimates is based on using Location Cost Adjustment Factors (LCAFs) that compute historically based costs by project location. Nowadays, numerous LCAF datasets are commercially available in North America, but, obviously, they do not include all locations. Hence, LCAFs for un-sampled locations need to be inferred through spatial interpolation or prediction methods. Currently, practitioners tend to select the value for a location using only one variable, namely the nearest linear-distance between two sites. However, construction costs could be affected by socio-economic variables as suggested by macroeconomic theories.Using a commonly used set of LCAFs, the City Cost Indexes (CCI) by RSMeans, and the socio-economic variables included in the ESRI Community Sourcebook, this article provides several contributions to the body of knowledge. First, the accuracy of various spatial prediction methods in estimating LCAF values for un-sampled locations was evaluated and assessed in respect to spatial interpolation methods. Two Regression-based prediction models were selected, a Global Regression Analysis and a Geographically-weighted regression analysis (GWR). Once these models were compared against interpolation methods, the results showed that GWR is the most appropriate way to model CCI as a function of multiple covariates. The outcome of GWR, for each covariate, was studied for all the 48 states in the contiguous US. As a direct consequence of spatial non-stationarity, it was possible to discuss the influence of each single covariate differently from state to state. In addition, the article includes a first attempt to determine if the observed variability in cost index values could be, at least partially explained by independent socio-economic variables.
机译:在可行性阶段,对建设成本的正确预测可确保从项目生命周期的开始就满足预算要求。一种执行快速数量级估计的非常常见的方法是基于使用位置成本调整因子(LCAF),该因子按项目位置计算基于历史的成本。如今,北美有许多LCAF数据集可商业获得,但显然,它们并不包括所有位置。因此,需要通过空间插值或预测方法来推断未采样位置的LCAF。当前,从业者倾向于仅使用一个变量来选择位置的值,即两个位置之间的最近线性距离。但是,如宏观经济理论所建议的那样,建筑成本可能会受到社会经济变量的影响。使用一组常用的LCAF,RSMeans的城市成本指数(CCI)以及《 ESRI社区资料手册》中包含的社会经济变量,文章为知识体系提供了一些贡献。首先,针对空间插值方法评估和评估了各种空间预测方法在估计未采样位置的LCAF值方面的准确性。选择了两个基于回归的预测模型,即全局回归分析和地理加权回归分析(GWR)。将这些模型与插值方法进行比较后,结果表明,GWR是将CCI建模为多个协变量的函数的最合适方法。研究了美国连续48个州中每个协变量的GWR结果。由于空间非平稳性的直接结果,可能因州而异地讨论每个单个协变量的影响。另外,该文章包括首次尝试确定观察到的成本指数值的可变性是否可以至少部分地由独立的社会经济变量来解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号