首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Individual and group sensitivity to remedial reading program design: Examining reading gains across three middle school reading projects
【2h】

Individual and group sensitivity to remedial reading program design: Examining reading gains across three middle school reading projects

机译:个人和群体对补救阅读计划设计的敏感性:在三个中学阅读项目中检查读数收益

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this project was to examine group- and individual-level responses by struggling adolescents readers (6th – 8th grades; N = 155) to three different modalities of the same reading program, Reading Achievement Multi-Component Program (RAMP-UP). The three modalities differ in the combination of reading components (phonological decoding, spelling, fluency, comprehension) that are taught and their organization. Latent change scores were used to examine changes in phonological decoding, fluency, and comprehension for each modality at the group level. In addition, individual students were classified as gainers versus non-gainers (a reading level increase of a year or more vs. less than one year) so that characteristics of gainers and differential sensitivity to instructional modality could be investigated. Findings from both group and individual analyses indicated that reading outcomes were related to modalities of reading instruction. Furthermore, differences in reading gains were seen between students who began treatment with higher reading scores than those with lower reading scores; dependent on modality of treatment. Results, examining group and individual analyses similarities and differences, and the effect the different modalities have on reading outcomes for older struggling readers will be discussed.
机译:该项目的目的是通过努力使青少年读者(第6级,– 8级; N = 155)努力应对三种不同的阅读方式,来检验小组和个人的回应。相同的阅读程序,即阅读成就多组件程序(RAMP-UP)。三种模式的差异在于所教授的阅读成分(语音解码,拼写,流利程度,理解能力)及其组织方式的组合。潜在变化分数用于检查小组级别上每个模态的语音解码,流利度和理解力的变化。此外,将个别学生分为受益者与非受益者(阅读水平增加一年或更多而少于一年),从而可以研究受益者的特征和对教学方式的差异敏感性。小组分析和个人分析的结果均表明,阅读结果与阅读教学方式有关。此外,在开始接受较高阅读分数治疗的学生与接受较低阅读分数治疗的学生之间,阅读增益有所差异。取决于治疗方式。将讨论结果,检查组和个人分析的异同,以及不同方式对苦苦阅读的老年读者的阅读结果的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号