首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >From Cases to Capacity? A Critical Reflection on the Role of ‘Ethical Dilemmas’ in the Development of Dual-Use Governance
【2h】

From Cases to Capacity? A Critical Reflection on the Role of ‘Ethical Dilemmas’ in the Development of Dual-Use Governance

机译:从案例到能力?对两难困境在双重用途治理发展中的作用的批判性思考

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The dual-use issue is often framed as a series of paralyzing ‘dilemmas’ facing the scientific community as well as institutions which support innovation. While this conceptualization of the dual-use issue can be useful in certain contexts (such as in awareness-raising and as part of educational activities directed at the scientific community) its usefulness is more limited when reflecting on the governance and politics of the dual-use issue. Within this paper, key shortcomings of the dilemma framing are outlined. It is argued that many of the issues raised in the most recent debates about ‘dual-use’ bird flu research remain unresolved. This includes questions about the trajectories of certain lines of research, as well as broader trends in the practice and governance of science. This leads to difficult questions about current approaches to the dual-use issue within the US, as well as internationally.
机译:双重用途问题通常被描述为一系列使科学界以及支持创新的机构陷入瘫痪的“困境”。尽管对双重使用问题的这种概念化在某些情况下(例如在提高认识中以及作为针对科学界的教育活动的一部分)可能是有用的,但在对双重使用权的治理和政治进行反思时,其用途却更为有限。使用问题。在本文中,概述了困境框架的主要缺点。有人认为,在最近关于“双重用途”禽流感研究的辩论中提出的许多问题仍未解决。这包括有关某些研究领域的轨迹的问题,以及科学实践和治理的更广泛趋势。这导致了关于美国以及国际上当前针对两用问题的处理方法的难题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号