首页> 外文期刊>Transnational environmental law >Global Governance, Sustainability and the Earth System: Critical Reflections on the Role of Global Law
【24h】

Global Governance, Sustainability and the Earth System: Critical Reflections on the Role of Global Law

机译:全球治理,可持续性和地球系统:对全球法学作用的关键思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract This article begins by questioning the capacity of the concept of sustainable development to stabilize social reproduction and foster global justice. Based on interdisciplinary perspectives on global governance, it discusses the way in which global law fails to cope with the resonance of advanced capitalism in the world society and ecological systems. Our analysis focuses on the regulatory and institutional features of three interwoven functional regulatory regimes (global finance, energy, and environmental protection), which demonstrate structural governance dysfunction at the expense of ecological integrity and justice in the global realm. The article further examines the capacity of global law to foster a ‘compositive’ and ‘compensatory’ contribution to global justice and the stability of the Earth system through global constitutionalism. In this context, it concludes that Neil Walker's global law approach provides a fertile analytical framework for describing the patterns of interaction between different species of global law but proves to be particularly ‘slippery’ in its normative propositions regarding the gap between global law and justice. Drawing from the Earth system approach, we argue in favour of a global material constitutionalism, recognizant of ecosystemic boundaries and socio-environmental impacts of the global socio-economic metabolism. We consider that the gap between global law and global justice is best addressed by devising more deliberative patterns of transnational governance, as well as ecosystem and human rights approaches, in order to accommodate the fair and equitable internalization of material limits across global regulatory regimes that act as functionally differentiated economic constitutions of advanced capitalism.
机译:摘要本文始于质疑可持续发展概念的能力,以稳定社会复制和促进全球正义。基于全球治理的跨学科观点,它讨论了全球法律未能应对世界社会和生态系统的先进资本主义的共鸣的方式。我们的分析侧重于三个交织职能监管制度(全球金融,能源和环境保护)的监管和体制特征,其展示了全球领域生态完整性和正义的结构治理功能障碍。本文进一步探讨了全球法律促进“综合”和“补偿性”对全球司法的贡献以及通过全球宪政的稳定性的贡献。在这种情况下,它的结论是,尼尔沃克的全球法律方法为描述了描述不同种类法律之间的相互作用模式,但证明在全球法律与正义之间差距的规范主张中特别“滑移”的效果分析框架。从地球系统方法中绘制,我们争辩支持全球物质宪政,承认生态系统界限和社会环境影响的全球社会经济新陈代谢。我们认为,全球法律和全球司法之间的差距是最好的,通过设计更多的跨国治理模式以及生态系统和人权方法,以适应行动的全球监管制度的公平和公平的重大内容正如功能差异化的经济宪法的先进资本主义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号