首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Interim vs. Standard Methadone Treatment: A Benefit-Cost Analysis
【2h】

Interim vs. Standard Methadone Treatment: A Benefit-Cost Analysis

机译:中期与标准美沙酮治疗:效益成本分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A benefit-cost analysis was conducted as part of a clinical trial in which newly-admitted methadone patients were randomly assigned to interim methadone (IM; methadone without counseling) for the first 4 months of 12 months of methadone treatment or 12 months of methadone with one of two counseling conditions. Health, residential drug treatment, criminal justice costs, and income data in 2010 dollars were obtained at treatment entry, and 4- and 12-month follow-up from 200 participants and program costs were obtained. The net benefits of treatment were greater for the IM condition but controlling for the baseline variables noted above, the difference between conditions in net monetary benefits was not significant. For the combined sample, there was a pre- to post-treatment net benefit of $1,470 (95% CI: −$625; $3584) and a benefit-cost ratio of 1.5 (95% CI: 0.8, 2.3), but using our conservative approach to calculating benefits, these values were not significant.
机译:作为一项临床试验的一部分,进行了效益成本分析,在该试验中,将新入院的美沙酮患者在美沙酮治疗的12个月或美沙酮治疗12个月的前4个月中随机分配给临时美沙酮(IM;无咨询的美沙酮)。两种咨询条件之一。在进入治疗时获得了健康,住院药物治疗,刑事司法费用以及2010年美元的收入数据,并获得了200名参与者进行的4个月和12个月的随访,并获得了计划费用。 IM病情的治疗净收益更大,但控制上述基线变量后,病情净货币收益之间的差异并不显着。对于合并后的样本,治疗前后的净收益为1,470美元(95%CI:−625美元; 3584美元),收益成本比为1.5(95%CI:0.8、2.3),但采用我们的保守估计在计算收益的方法中,这些价值并不显着。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号