首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >TNR and conservation on a university campus: a political ecological perspective
【2h】

TNR and conservation on a university campus: a political ecological perspective

机译:大学校园的TNR和保护:政治生态学的观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

How to manage the impact of free-ranging cats on native wildlife is a polarizing issue. Conservation biologists largely support domestic cat euthanasia to mitigate impacts of free-ranging cat predation on small animal populations. Above all else, animal welfare activists support the humane treatment of free-ranging cats, objecting to euthanasia. Clearly, this issue of how to control free-ranging cat predation on small animals is value laden, and both positions must be considered and comprehended to promote effective conservation. Here, two gaps in the free-ranging cat—small-animal conservation literature are addressed. First, the importance of understanding the processes of domestication and evolution and how each relates to felid behavioral ecology is discussed. The leading hypothesis to explain domestication of wildcats (Felis silvestris) relates to their behavioral ecology as a solitary predator, which made them suited for pest control in early agricultural villages of the Old World. The relationship humans once had with cats, however, has changed because today domesticated cats are usually household pets. As a result, concerns of conservation biologists may relate to cats as predators, but cat welfare proponents come from the position of assuming responsibility for free-ranging household pets (and their feral offspring). Thus, the perceptions of pet owners and other members of the general public provide an important context that frames the relationship between free-ranging cats and small animal conservation. The second part of this paper assesses the effects of an information-based conservation approach on shifting student’s perception of a local Trap–Neuter–Return (TNR) program in introductory core science classes at the University of North Texas (UNT). UNT students are (knowingly or unknowingly) regularly in close proximity to a TNR program on campus that supports cat houses and feeding stations. A survey design implementing a tailored-information approach was used to communicate what TNR programs are, their goals, and the “conservationist” view of TNR programs. We gauged favorability of student responses to the goals of TNR programs prior to and after exposure to tailored information on conservation concerns related to free-ranging cats. Although these results are from a preliminary study, we suggest that an information-based approach may only be marginally effective at shifting perceptions about the conservation implications of free-ranging cats. Our position is that small animal conservation in Western societies occurs in the context of pet ownership, thus broader approaches that promote ecological understanding via environmental education are more likely to be successful than information-based approaches.
机译:如何管理散养猫对本地野生动物的影响是一个两极分化的问题。保护生物学家在很大程度上支持家猫的安乐死,以减轻自由放养的猫食对小动物种群的影响。最重要的是,动物福利积极分子支持对放养猫的人道待遇,反对安乐死。显然,如何控制小动物自由放养猫的捕食这个问题是重担,必须考虑并理解两个立场以促进有效的保护。在这里,解决了自由放养的猫的两个空白-小动物保护文献。首先,讨论了理解驯化和进化过程以及它们与猫行为生态学之间的关系的重要性。解释野猫(Felis silvestris)驯化的主要假设与它们作为孤独捕食者的行为生态有关,这使其适合于旧大陆早期农业村庄中的虫害防治。但是,人类曾经与猫之间的关系发生了变化,因为今天的家养猫通常是家庭宠物。结果,保护生物学家的担忧可能与作为掠食者的猫有关,但是猫福利的拥护者来自承担家庭宠物(及其野性后代)自由放养的责任。因此,宠物主人和其他普通民众的看法提供了一个重要的背景,勾勒出自由放养的猫与小型动物保护之间的关系。本文的第二部分评估了基于信息的保护方法在北德州大学(UNT)入门级核心科学课程中,转移了学生对本地Trap-Neuter-Return(TNR)计划的认识的影响。 UNT学生经常(不知不觉中)定期接近校园的TNR计划,该计划支持猫舍和饲养站。使用实施量身定制的信息方法的调查设计来传达TNR计划的含义,目标以及TNR计划的“保守主义者”观点。在接触有关放养猫的保护问题的量身定制信息之前和之后,我们评估了学生对TNR计划目标的反应是否满意。尽管这些结果来自初步研究,但我们建议以信息为基础的方法只能有效地转移人们对放养猫的保护意义的认识。我们的立场是,西方社会对小动物的保护是在养宠物的情况下发生的,因此,通过环境教育促进生态理解的更广泛的方法比基于信息的方法更可能成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号