首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Specific Learning Disorder: Prevalence and Gender Differences
【2h】

Specific Learning Disorder: Prevalence and Gender Differences

机译:特定学习障碍:患病率和性别差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Comprehensive models of learning disorders have to consider both isolated learning disorders that affect one learning domain only, as well as comorbidity between learning disorders. However, empirical evidence on comorbidity rates including all three learning disorders as defined by DSM-5 (deficits in reading, writing, and mathematics) is scarce. The current study assessed prevalence rates and gender ratios for isolated as well as comorbid learning disorders in a representative sample of 1633 German speaking children in 3rd and 4th Grade. Prevalence rates were analysed for isolated as well as combined learning disorders and for different deficit criteria, including a criterion for normal performance. Comorbid learning disorders occurred as frequently as isolated learning disorders, even when stricter cutoff criteria were applied. The relative proportion of isolated and combined disorders did not change when including a criterion for normal performance. Reading and spelling deficits differed with respect to their association with arithmetic problems: Deficits in arithmetic co-occurred more often with deficits in spelling than with deficits in reading. In addition, comorbidity rates for arithmetic and reading decreased when applying stricter deficit criteria, but stayed high for arithmetic and spelling irrespective of the chosen deficit criterion. These findings suggest that the processes underlying the relationship between arithmetic and reading might differ from those underlying the relationship between arithmetic and spelling. With respect to gender ratios, more boys than girls showed spelling deficits, while more girls were impaired in arithmetic. No gender differences were observed for isolated reading problems and for the combination of all three learning disorders. Implications of these findings for assessment and intervention of learning disorders are discussed.
机译:学习障碍的综合模型必须考虑仅影响一个学习领域的孤立学习障碍,以及学习障碍之间的合并症。但是,缺乏关于合并症发生率的经验证据,包括DSM-5定义的所有三种学习障碍(阅读,写作和数学上的不足)。目前的研究评估了1633名3级和4级的德语儿童的代表性样本和共患学习障碍的患病率和性别比。对孤立和合并学习障碍的患病率进行了分析,并针对不同的赤字标准(包括正常表现的标准)进行了分析。即使采用更严格的临界标准,合并症学习障碍的发生频率也与孤立学习障碍相同。当包括正常表现的标准时,孤立和合并疾病的相对比例没有改变。阅读和拼写缺陷与算术问题的关联有所不同:算术缺陷与拼写缺陷多于阅读缺陷。此外,使用更严格的缺陷标准时,算术和阅读的合并症发生率降低,但是无论选择哪种缺陷标准,算术和拼写的合并症发病率都很高。这些发现表明,算术与阅读之间关系的基础过程可能不同于算术与拼写之间关系的基础过程。关于性别比例,男孩的拼写缺陷比女孩多,而女孩的算术障碍则更多。对于孤立的阅读问题和所有三种学习障碍的合并症,均未观察到性别差异。讨论了这些发现对学习障碍的评估和干预的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号