首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Observing end-state comfort favorable actions does not modulate action plan recall
【2h】

Observing end-state comfort favorable actions does not modulate action plan recall

机译:观察最终状态舒适度有利的行为不会影响行动计划的召回

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A large corpus of work demonstrates that observing other people’s actions activates corresponding motor representations in the observer by running an internal simulation of the observed action. Recent evidence suggests that recalled action plans reflect a plan of how the observer would execute that action (based on the specific motor representation) rather than a plan of the actually observed action (based on the visual representation). This study examined whether people would recall an action plan based on a visual representation if the observed movement is biomechanically favorable for their own subsequent action. Participants performed an object manipulation task alongside a confederate. In the intra-individual task, the participant (or confederate) transported a plunger from an outer platform of fixed height to a center target platform located at different heights (home-to-target move), and then the same person transported the plunger back to the outer platform (target-back-to-home move). In the inter-individual task, the sequence was split between the two persons such that the participant (or confederate) performed the home-to-target move and the other person performed the target-back-to-home move. Importantly, the confederate always grasped the plunger at the same height. This grasp height was designated such that if participants would copy the action (i.e., grasp the object at the same height) it would place the participant’s arm in a comfortable position at the end of the target-back-to-home move (i.e., end-state comfort). Results show that participants’ grasp height was inversely related to center target height and similar regardless of direction (home-to-target vs. target-back-to-home move) and task (intra- vs. inter-individual). In addition, during the inter-individual task, participant’s target-back-to-home grasp height was correlated with their own, but not with the confederate’s grasp height during the home-to-target moves. These findings provide evidence that observing actions that are biomechanically favorable for subsequent action execution does not influence action plan recall processes.
机译:大量的工作表明,观察他人的行为可以通过对观察到的行为进行内部模拟来激活观察者中相应的运动表现。最近的证据表明,召回的行动计划反映的是观察者如何执行该行动的计划(基于特定的运动表现),而不是实际观察到的行动的计划(基于视觉表现)。这项研究调查了人们是否会根据视觉表现回忆起一项行动计划,如果观察到的动作在生物力学上有利于他们自己的后续行动。参与者与同盟者一起执行对象操纵任务。在个人内部任务中,参与者(或同盟者)将活塞从固定高度的外部平台运输到位于不同高度的中心目标平台(从目标到目标的移动),然后同一个人将活塞推回到外部平台(目标回原点移动)。在个体间任务中,序列在两个人之间进行划分,以使参与者(或同盟者)执行从家到目标的移动,而另一个人执行从目标到家的移动。重要的是,同盟国始终将柱塞握在同一高度。指定此抓握高度,以便如果参与者复制动作(即以相同的高度抓握物体),则它将在目标返回原点移动结束时将参与者的手臂置于舒适的位置(即,最终状态的舒适性)。结果表明,参与者的抓握高度与中心目标高度成反比,并且与方向(从家庭到目标与目标从背到家的移动)和任务(个体内部或个体间)无关。此外,在个人间任务中,参与者的目标背对家抓握高度与他们自己的关联,但与同伙在目标对家移动时的抓握高度无关。这些发现提供了证据,观察对后续行动执行有利的生物力学行动不会影响行动计划的召回过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号