首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparative studies on performance of CCC and preparative RP-HPLC in separation and purification of steroid saponins from Dioscorea zingiberensis C.H.Wright
【2h】

Comparative studies on performance of CCC and preparative RP-HPLC in separation and purification of steroid saponins from Dioscorea zingiberensis C.H.Wright

机译:CCC和制备型RP-HPLC分离和纯化盾叶薯os中甾体皂苷的性能比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Steroid saponins from Dioscorea zingiberensis C.H.Wright were separated for the first time using two chromatographic methods for comparison: counter-current chromatography (CCC) coupled with evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD) and preparative reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) with an ultraviolet detector. Ethyl acetate-n-butanol-methanol-water (4:1:2:4, v/v) was chosen as the two-phase solvent system for CCC, while the acetonitrile-water (25:75 for the first step and15:85 for the second step, v/v) was used as the mobile phase in the preparative RP-HPLC. The following five steroid saponins were purified by theses two chromatographic methods, in one-step operation by CCC and by two-step operation in preparative RP-HPLC: 1) 26-O-β-D- glucopyranosyl-(25R)-furost-5-en-3β, 22ζ, 26-triol-3-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranoside (>compound A), 2) 26-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(25R)-furost-5-en-3β, 22ζ, 4) 26-triol-3-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→3)-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranoside (>compound B), 3) 26-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(25R)-furost-5-en-3β, 22ζ, 26-triol-3-O-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→4)]-β-D-glucopyranoside (>compound C), 4) 26-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(25R)-furost-5, 20(22)-diene-3β, 26-diol-3-O-{α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→4)-[β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→2)]}-β-D-glucopyranoside (>compound D) and 5) 26-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(25R)-furost-5, 20(22)-diene-3β, 26-diol-3-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)-α-L-rhamnopyranosy-(1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranoside (>compound E). The purities of these five steroid saponins separated by both methods were over 95%, and structural identification of these compounds was performed by ESI-MS, and 13C NMR. Comparison of these two established approaches revealed that CCC required a longer separation time but with less solvent consumption, whereas preparative RP-HPLC gave a shorter separation time but with higher solvent consumption. These results demonstrated that either of these two methods of different separation mechanism is feasible, economical and efficient for rapid preparative isolation and purification of steroid saponins from Dioscorea zingiberensis C.H.Wright.
机译:使用两种色谱法进行比较,首次分离了盾叶薯os中的类固醇皂苷:逆流色谱法(CCC)和蒸发光散射检测器(ELSD)以及制备型反相高效液相色谱法(RP-HPLC)用紫外线探测器。选择乙酸乙酯-正丁醇-甲醇-水(4:1:2:4,v / v)作为CCC的两相溶剂系统,而乙腈-水(第一步为25:75和15:对于第二步,将85(v / v)用作制备型RP-HPLC中的流动相。通过这两种色谱方法,通过CCC一步操作和制备型RP-HPLC中的两步操作,纯化了以下五种甾体皂苷:1)26-O-β-D-吡喃葡糖基-(25R)-糠醛- 5-en-3β,22ζ,26-三醇-3-O- [β-D-吡喃葡萄糖基-(1→3)-β-D-吡喃葡萄糖基-(1→4)-α-L-鼠李糖基-(1→ 2)]-β-D-吡喃葡萄糖苷(>化合物A ),2)26-O-β-D-吡喃葡萄糖基-(25R)-furost-5-en-3β,22ζ,4)26 -triol-3-O- [β-D-吡喃葡萄糖基-(1→3)-α-L-鼠李糖吡喃糖基-(1→2)]-β-D-吡喃葡萄糖苷(>化合物B ), 3)26-O-β-D-吡喃葡萄糖基-(25R)-呋喃基-5-en-3β,22ζ,26-三醇-3-O- [α-L-鼠李糖基-(1→4)]-β- D-吡喃葡萄糖苷(>化合物C ),4)26-O-β-D-吡喃葡萄糖基-(25R)-furost-5,20(22)-二烯-3β,26-diol-3- O- {α-L-鼠李吡喃糖基-(1→4)-[β-D-吡喃吡喃糖基-(1→3)-β-D-吡喃吡喃糖基-(1→2)]}-β-D-吡喃吡喃糖苷( >化合物D )和5)26-O-β-D-吡喃葡萄糖基-(25R)-furost-5、20(22)-二烯-3β,26-二醇-3-O- [β-D -吡喃葡萄糖基-(1→4)-α-L-鼠李糖yranosy-(1→2)]-β-D-吡喃葡萄糖苷(>化合物E )。两种方法分离得到的这五种甾体皂苷的纯度均超过95%,并通过ESI-MS和 13 C NMR进行了结构鉴定。对这两种已建立方法的比较表明,CCC需要更长的分离时间,但溶剂消耗较少,而制备型RP-HPLC的分离时间较短,但溶剂消耗较高。这些结果表明,这两种不同分离机理的方法对于从薯either中快速分离制备和纯化甾体皂苷是可行,经济和有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号