首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients with Diabetes: the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Blood Pressure Trial
【2h】

Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients with Diabetes: the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Blood Pressure Trial

机译:降压对糖尿病患者左心室肥大的影响:控制糖尿病心血管风险的措施(ACCORD)血压试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), a marker of cardiac end-organ damage, is a common complication of hypertension. Regression of LVH is achievable by sustained lowering of systolic blood pressure (SBP). However, it is unknown whether a strategy aimed at lowering BP beyond that recommended would lower the risk of LVH. We examined the effect of intensive (SBP<120 mmHg), compared to standard (SBP<140 mmHg), BP lowering on the risk of LVH in 4,331 patients with diabetes from the from the ACCORD BP trial, a randomized controlled trial. The outcomes measures were electrocardiographic LVH defined by Cornell voltage (binary variable) and mean Cornell index (continuous variable). The baseline prevalence of LVH (5.3% vs. 5.4%, p= 0.91) and the mean Cornell index (1456 µV vs. 1470 µV, p=0.45) were similar in the intensive (n=2154) and standard (n=2177) BP lowering arms, respectively. However, after median follow up of 4.4 years, intensive, compared to standard, BP lowering was associated with a 39% lower risk of LVH (odds ratio(95% CI):0.61(0.43, 0.88); p=0.008) and a significantly lower adjusted mean Cornell index (1352 µV vs. 1447 µV; p<0.001). The lower risk of LVH associated with intensive BP lowering during follow up was due to more regression of baseline LVH and lower rate of developing new LVH, compared to standard BP lowering. No interactions by age, sex, or race were observed. These results provide evidence that targeting a systolic BP<120 mmHg, as compared with <140 mm Hg, in patients with hypertension and diabetes produces a greater reduction in LVH.>Clinical Trial Registration: number,
机译:左心室肥大(LVH)是心脏终末器官损害的标志,是高血压的常见并发症。通过持续降低收缩压(SBP)可实现LVH的回归。但是,尚不清楚旨在将血压降低至建议值以下的策略是否会降低LVH的风险。我们从随机对照试验ACCORD BP试验中,研究了重度血压(SBP <120 mmHg)与标准血压(SBP <140 mmHg)相比,血压降低对4,331例糖尿病患者LVH风险的影响。结果测量是通过康奈尔电压(二进制变量)和平均康奈尔指数(连续变量)定义的心电图LVH。在强化(n = 2154)和标准(n = 2177)中,LVH的基线患病率(5.3%vs. 5.4%,p = 0.91)和平均康奈尔指数(1456 µV vs. 1470 µV,p = 0.45)相似。 )BP下降臂。但是,中位随访时间为4.4年,与标准相比,强化后血压降低与LVH风险降低39%相关(几率(95%CI):0.61(0.43,0.88); p = 0.008)和调整后的平均康奈尔指数显着降低(1352 µV与1447 µV; p <0.001)。与标准BP降低相比,随访期间LVH降低与强化BP降低相关的风险较低,是由于基线LVH回归程度更高和新LVH发生率降低。没有观察到按年龄,性别或种族的互动。这些结果提供了证据,将高血压和糖尿病患者的收缩压目标定为收缩压<120 mmHg,而<140 mm Hg则LVH降低更大。>临床试验注册:

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号