首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Drug delivery systems for ovarian cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies
【2h】

Drug delivery systems for ovarian cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies

机译:用于卵巢癌治疗的药物输送系统:对动物研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Current ovarian cancer treatment involves chemotherapy that has serious limitations, such as rapid clearance, unfavorable biodistribution and severe side effects. To overcome these limitations, drug delivery systems (DDS) have been developed to encapsulate chemotherapeutics for delivery to tumor cells. However, no systematic assessment of the efficacy of chemotherapy by DDS compared to free chemotherapy (not in a DDS) has been performed for animal studies. Here, we assess the efficacy of chemotherapy in DDS on survival and tumor growth inhibition in animal studies. We searched PubMed and EMBASE (via OvidSP) to systematically identify studies evaluating chemotherapeutics encapsulated in DDS for ovarian cancer treatment in animal studies. Studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias. Study characteristics were collected and outcome data (survival/hazard ratio or tumor growth inhibition) were extracted and used for meta-analyses. Meta-analysis was performed to identify and explore which characteristics of DDS influenced treatment efficacy. A total of 44 studies were included after thorough literature screening (2,735 studies found after initial search). The risk of bias was difficult to assess, mainly because of incomplete reporting. A total of 17 studies (377 animals) and 16 studies (259 animals) could be included in the meta-analysis for survival and tumor growth inhibition, respectively. In the majority of the included studies chemotherapeutics entrapped in a DDS significantly improved efficacy over free chemotherapeutics regarding both survival and tumor growth inhibition. Subgroup analyses, however, revealed that cisplatin entrapped in a DDS did not result in additional tumor growth inhibition compared to free cisplatin, although it did result in improved survival. Micelles did not show a significant tumor growth inhibition compared to free chemotherapeutics, which indicates that micelles may not be a suitable DDS for ovarian cancer treatment. Other subgroup analyses, such as targeted versus non-targeted DDS or IV versus IP administration route, did not identify specific characteristics of DDS that affected treatment efficacy. This systematic review shows the potential, but also the limitations of chemotherapy by drug delivery systems for ovarian cancer treatment. For future animal research, we emphasize that data need to be reported with ample attention to detailed reporting.
机译:当前的卵巢癌治疗涉及具有严重局限性的化学疗法,例如快速清除,不利的生物分布和严重的副作用。为了克服这些限制,已经开发了药物递送系统(DDS)以封装用于递送至肿瘤细胞的化学治疗剂。但是,对于动物研究,尚未对DDS与游离化学疗法(非DDS中)相比化学疗法的疗效进行系统评估。在这里,我们在动物研究中评估了DDS化疗对生存和肿瘤生长抑制的功效。我们搜索了PubMed和EMBASE(通过OvidSP)来系统地确定评估DDS中封装的化学疗法用于动物研究中的卵巢癌治疗的研究。评估研究的质量和偏倚风险。收集研究特征,并提取结局数据(生存/危险比或肿瘤生长抑制)并将其用于荟萃分析。进行荟萃分析,以识别和探索DDS的哪些特征影响治疗效果。经过全面的文献筛选后,总共纳入了44项研究(初步搜索后发现了2,735项研究)。偏见的风险很难评估,主要是因为报告不完整。荟萃分析中可分别纳入总共17项研究(377只动物)和16项研究(259只动物)以抑制生存和抑制肿瘤生长。在大多数纳入的研究中,在存活和肿瘤生长抑制方面,DDS中包埋的化学治疗剂均显着优于游离化学治疗剂。但是,亚组分析显示,与游离顺铂相比,DDS中包埋的顺铂不会导致额外的肿瘤生长抑制,尽管确实会提高生存率。与游离化学疗法相比,胶束没有显示出明显的肿瘤生长抑制作用,这表明胶束可能不是适合卵巢癌治疗的DDS。其他亚组分析,例如靶向与非靶向DDS或IV与IP给药途径,并未发现影响治疗功效的DDS的特定特征。这项系统的综述显示了通过药物输送系统进行卵巢癌治疗的潜力,但也有局限性。对于将来的动物研究,我们强调需要在报告数据的同时充分注意详细的报告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号