首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >ERP Correlates of Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control in Treatment-Naïve Adult ADHD
【2h】

ERP Correlates of Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control in Treatment-Naïve Adult ADHD

机译:ERP与未经治疗的成人ADHD的主动和反应性认知控制相关

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigated whether treatment naïve adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD; n = 33; 19 female) differed from healthy controls (n = 31; 17 female) in behavioral performance, event-related potential (ERP) indices of preparatory attention (CueP3 and late CNV), and reactive response control (Go P3, NoGo N2, and NoGo P3) derived from a visual cued Go/NoGo task. On several critical measures, Cue P3, late CNV, and NoGo N2, there were no significant differences between the groups. This indicated normal preparatory processes and conflict monitoring in ADHD patients. However, the patients had attenuated Go P3 and NoGoP3 amplitudes relative to controls, suggesting reduced allocation of attentional resources to processes involved in response control. The patients also had a higher rate of Go signal omission errors, but no other performance decrements compared with controls. Reduced Go P3 and NoGo P3 amplitudes were associated with poorer task performance, particularly in the ADHD group. Notably, the ERPs were not associated with self-reported mood or anxiety. The results provide electrophysiological evidence for reduced effortful engagement of attentional resources to both Go and NoGo signals when reactive response control is needed. The absence of group differences in ERP components indexing proactive control points to impairments in specific aspects of cognitive processes in an untreated adult ADHD cohort. The associations between ERPs and task performance provided additional support for the altered electrophysiological responses.
机译:这项研究调查了在行为表现,事件相关电位(ERP)指标的预备性注意事项上,未治疗过的成人注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD; n = 33; 19女)是否与健康对照组(n = 31; 17女)不同( CueP3和后期CNV)以及从视觉提示的Go / NoGo任务派生的反应式响应控制(Go P3,NoGo N2和NoGo P3)。在一些关键指标(提示P3,晚期CNV和NoGo N2)上,两组之间没有显着差异。这表明ADHD患者的正常准备过程和冲突监测。但是,相对于对照,患者的Go P3和NoGoP3幅度已减弱,这表明注意力资源分配到响应控制所涉及的过程减少了。患者的Go信号遗漏错误率也更高,但是与对照组相比,其他表现均未降低。 Go P3和NoGo P3振幅降低与较差的任务性能相关,尤其是在ADHD组中。值得注意的是,ERP与自我报告的情绪或焦虑无关。该结果提供了电生理证据,可减少需要反应性控制时注意力资源对Go和NoGo信号的投入。在未经治疗的成人多动症(ADHD)成年人群中,ERP组件索引主动控制中没有组间差异表明认知过程的特定方面存在损伤。 ERPs与任务绩效之间的关联为改变的电生理反应提供了额外的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号