首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion combined with cervical disc arthroplasty and cervical disc arthroplasty for the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease
【2h】

A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion combined with cervical disc arthroplasty and cervical disc arthroplasty for the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease

机译:颈椎前路椎间盘切除术与融合结合颈椎间盘成形术和颈椎间盘成形术治疗跳跃性宫颈变性椎间盘疾病的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been widely performed for the treatment of multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). In recent decades, cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and hybrid surgery (HS) have been developed to overcome the shortcomings of ACDF. Controversy still remains with regard to the optimal surgical procedure for skip-level CDDD.A total of 55 patients who received surgical treatment for skip-level CDDD in our department were reviewed. The patients were divided into the HS group (n = 29) and the CDA group (n = 26). The collected data included Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, and cervical lordosis (CL), range of motion (ROM), and intervertebral disc height (IDH). Radiological changes at the intermediate segment (IS) were also collected. All data were collected preoperatively and at routine postoperative intervals of 1 week and 3, 6, and 12 months and at the last follow-up period.Compared with preoperative values, mean JOA, NDI, and VAS scores significantly improved after surgery in both the HS and CDA groups (P < .05). However, there were no significant differences between the groups (P > .05). The HS group had better CL recovery than the CDA group after surgery (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the ROM of C2–C7 between the 2 groups (P > .05). A significant difference in the ROM of the IS was found at the last follow-up between the 2 groups (P < .05). At the last-follow-up, 4 discs (14.29%) in the CDA group and 6 discs (19.36%) in the HS group had adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) without symptoms.Both HS and CDA might be considered safe and effective surgical strategies for the treatment of skip-level CDDD. Although the clinical outcomes were similar in the 2 groups, CDA altered the ROM of the IS to a lesser degree.
机译:颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)已广泛用于治疗多级颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病(CDDD)。近几十年来,已经开发了颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)和混合手术(HS)来克服ACDF的缺点。关于跳过级CDDD的最佳手术方法仍存在争议。我们部门共对55名接受跳过级CDDD手术治疗的患者进行了回顾。将患者分为HS组(n = 29)和CDA组(n = 26)。收集的数据包括日本骨科协会(JOA),颈部残疾指数(NDI)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)得分,颈椎前凸(CL),运动范围(ROM)和椎间盘高度(IDH)。还收集了中间段(IS)的放射学变化。所有数据均在术前以及术后1周,3、6和12个月的常规术后间隔以及最后一次随访期间进行收集。 HS和CDA组(P <0.05。)。但是,两组之间没有显着差异(P> .05)。术后HS组的CL恢复优于CDA组(P <0.05)。两组之间的C2-C7 ROM差异无统计学意义(P> .05)。在两组之间的最后一次随访中发现IS的ROM有显着差异(P <0.05)。末次随访时,CDA组4片(14.29%)和HS组6片(19.36%)有无症状的邻近节段变性(ASD),HS和CDA均被认为是安全有效的手术方法跳过级CDDD的治疗策略。尽管两组的临床结果相似,但CDA改变了IS的ROM程度较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号