Comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc degenerative diseases on the basis of more than 60?months of follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis

摘要

This meta-analysis was designed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety between cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in treating cervical disc degenerative diseases (CDDDs). Literature search was performed on Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science before Jan 2019. Surgical details, clinical outcomes, range of motion (ROM), complications, and reoperation rates between CDA and ACDF groups were compared and analyzed. A fixed- or random-effects model was applied based on different heterogeneity. STATA (Version 11.0) software was used to perform data analysis. A total of 13 randomized controlled trial studies with more than 60?months of follow-up (mean 83.1?months) were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Pool results indicated that the CDA group exhibited significantly better outcomes in clinical scores (odds ratio [OR]?=?1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15–2.08, p?=?0.004) and preservation of ROM (mean difference?=?1.77, 95% CI: 1.60–1.95, p??0.001) than the ACDF group. Meanwhile, the incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) (OR?=?0.51, 95% CI: 0.35–0.76, p?=?0.001) and occurrence of reoperation (OR?=?0.41, 95% CI: 0.25–0.69, p?=?0.001) were lower in the CDA group than in the ACDF group. At long-term follow-up, CDA showed better efficacy in terms of clinical outcomes, ROM, ASD, and reoperation than ACDF for treating CDDDs. However, our results require further validation in large-sample and high-quality studies.