首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Conversational Time Travel: Evidence of a Retrospective Bias in Real Life Conversations
【2h】

Conversational Time Travel: Evidence of a Retrospective Bias in Real Life Conversations

机译:对话时间旅行:现实生活中对话中的追溯偏见的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We examined mental time travel reflected onto individuals’ utterances in real-life conversations using a naturalistic observation method: Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR, a portable audio recorder that periodically and unobtrusively records snippets of ambient sounds and speech). We introduced the term conversational time travel and examined, for the first time, how much individuals talked about their personal past versus personal future in real life. Study 1 included 9,010 sound files collected from 51 American adults who carried the EAR over 1 weekend and were recorded every 9 min for 50 s. Study 2 included 23,103 sound files from 33 young and 48 healthy older adults from Switzerland who carried the EAR for 4 days (2 weekdays and 1 weekend, counterbalanced). 30-s recordings occurred randomly throughout the day. We developed a new coding scheme for conversational time travel: We listened to all sound files and coded each file for whether the participant was talking or not. Those sound files that included participant speech were also coded in terms of their temporal focus (e.g., past, future, present, time-independent) and autobiographical nature (i.e., about the self, about others). We, first, validated our coding scheme using the text analysis tool, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Next, we compared the percentages of past- and future-oriented utterances about the self (to tap onto conversational time travel). Results were consistent across all samples and showed that participants talked about their personal past two to three times as much as their personal future (i.e., retrospective bias). This is in contrast to research showing a prospective bias in thinking behavior, based on self-report and experience-sampling methods. Findings are discussed in relation to the social functions of recalling the personal past (e.g., sharing memories to bond with others, to update each other, to teach, to give advice) and to the directive functions of future-oriented thought (e.g., planning, decision making, goal setting that are more likely to happen privately in the mind). In sum, the retrospective bias in conversational time travel seems to be a functional and universal phenomenon across persons and across real-life situations.
机译:我们使用一种自然主义的观察方法,考察了反映在现实对话中个人话语上的心理时间旅行:电子激活记录器(EAR,一种便携式音频记录器,可以定期且毫不干扰地记录环境声音和语音的摘要)。我们引入了会话时间旅行一词,并首次检查了多少个人谈论自己的过去与现实中的未来。研究1包括从51个美国成年人那里收集的9,010个声音文件,这些声音文件在一个周末内携带EAR,并且每9分钟记录一次,持续50 s。研究2包括来自瑞士的33位年轻人和48位健康的老年人的23,103个声音文件,他们携带EAR了4天(2个工作日和1个周末,平衡)。全天随机发生30秒的录音。我们为会话时间旅行开发了一种新的编码方案:我们收听所有声音文件,并对每个文件进行编码,以了解参与者是否在讲话。包括参与者语音的那些声音文件也按照其时间焦点(例如,过去,将来,现在,时间独立)和自传性质(即关于自我,关于其他人)进行编码。首先,我们使用文本分析工具,语言查询和字数统计来验证我们的编码方案。接下来,我们比较了关于自我的过去和未来话语的百分比(以利用对话时间旅行)。所有样本的结果都是一致的,表明参与者谈论自己的过去经历是其个人未来的2至3倍(即回顾性偏见)。这与基于自我报告和经验抽样方法的研究表明思维行为存在偏见的研究形成对比。讨论了有关以下方面的发现:回忆个人过去的社会功能(例如,与他人共享记忆,与他人保持联系,互相更新,教导,提供建议)和面向未来的思想的指导功能(例如,计划) ,决策,目标设定等更有可能私下里发生的事情)。总而言之,对话时间旅行中的回顾性偏见似乎是跨人和跨现实情况的一种功能性和普遍现象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号