首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Climate impacts of cultured meat and beef cattle
【2h】

Climate impacts of cultured meat and beef cattle

机译:养殖肉牛和肉牛对气候的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Improved greenhouse gas (GHG) emission efficiency of production has been proposed as one of the biggest potential advantages of cultured meat over conventional livestock production systems. Comparisons with beef are typically highlighted, as it is a highly emissions intensive food product. In this study we present a more rigorous comparison of the potential climate impacts of cultured meat and cattle production than has previously been made. Warming impacts are evaluated using a simple climate model that simulates the different behaviours of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), rather than relying on carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) metrics. We compare the temperature impact of beef cattle and cultured meat production at all times to 1000 years in the future, using four synthetic meat GHG footprints currently available in the literature and three different beef production systems studied in an earlier climate modelling paper. Cattle systems are associated with the production of all three GHGs above, including significant emissions of CH4, while cultured meat emissions are almost entirely CO2 from energy generation. Under continuous high global consumption, cultured meat results in less warming than cattle initially, but this gap narrows in the long term and in some cases cattle production causes far less warming, as CH4 emissions do not accumulate, unlike CO2. We then model a decline in meat consumption to more sustainable levels following high consumption, and show that although cattle systems generally result in greater peak warming than cultured meat, the warming effect declines and stabilises under the new emission rates of cattle systems, while the CO2 based warming from cultured meat persists and accumulates even under reduced consumption, again overtaking cattle production in some scenarios. We conclude that cultured meat is not prima facie climatically superior to cattle production; its relative impact instead depends on the availability of decarbonised energy generation and the specific production systems that are realised.
机译:与传统的牲畜生产系统相比,养殖肉的最大潜在优势之一是提高生产的温室气体(GHG)排放效率。通常会强调与牛肉的比较,因为它是排放量高的食品。在这项研究中,我们比以前更严格地比较了养殖肉和牛的潜在气候影响。使用简单的气候模型评估变暖的影响,该模型模拟二氧化碳(CO2),甲烷(CH4)和一氧化二氮(N2O)的不同行为,而不是依赖于二氧化碳当量(CO2e)指标。我们使用文献中当前可用的四个合成肉GHG足迹以及在较早的气候模型论文中研究的三个不同的牛肉生产系统,比较了未来1000年内肉牛和养殖肉的温度影响。牛系统与以上所有三个温室气体的产生有关,包括大量的CH4排放,而养殖肉的排放几乎完全来自能源生产中的CO2。在全球持续高消费的情况下,养殖肉类最初导致的变暖程度不及牛,但从长期来看,这一差距会缩小,并且在某些情况下,由于不积累CH4排放物(与CO2不同),牛的生产引起的变暖要少得多。然后,我们对高消费后肉类消费量下降到更可持续的水平进行建模,结果表明,尽管牛系统通常会比养殖肉类产生更高的峰值增温,但在新的牛群排放率下,变暖效应下降并稳定下来,而二氧化碳即使减少了消费量,来自养殖肉的变暖仍持续存在并累积,在某些情况下再次超过了牛的生产。我们得出的结论是,养殖的肉在气候上并不比牛的生产优越。相反,其相对影响取决于脱碳能源的可获得性和已实现的特定生产系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号